Federal AI Intelligence
Menu
Snapshot · OMB 2025 inventory · processed Oct 11, 2026
Federal AI landscape

Federal AI at a glance

1 agencies · 8 reported use cases · OMB 2025 Inventory. Portfolio size reflects reporting, not performance.

Executive briefing ↗Explore 8 use cases →
Agency1
Stage
High-impact1
Topic
AI type
Sourcing
Vendor
Function
Start year

Only records with a parseable start date match a year filter.

Agency: SSA · Social Security Administrationimpact_assessment: affirmativeHigh-impact: High-impact
8 Reported AI use cases1 agency7 Deployed1 Pilots8 Designated high-impact
Decorative federal AI network visualization; not a representation of agency deployment locations or relationships.
Scale & composition

Agencies behind federal AI

Select an agency to explore
Ring shows composition · node area shows use cases
SSA8
Pilot1Deployed7Largest portfolio: 8 · 1 agencies

Conceptual agency landscape · positions do not represent deployment locations. Proximity does not imply a relationship.

AI technology mix

Reported classification · click to cross-filter

25% generative or agentic. Each record carries one classification; not reported is shown hatched.

Mission areas

Topic area as reported

Lifecycle composition

8 records
Explore lifecycle stages and impact
Within each stageHigh-impact · Gen./agentic
Pilot100%100%
Deployed100%14%

Impact and technology shares use each stage's records as the denominator.

From development and acquisition to retirement. Select a stage to explore its reported use cases.

Reading the inventory

Evidence, with its limits visible

14% of reported deployed use cases (1 of 7) are classified as generative or agentic AI.

Understand the methodology →

Evolution of reported AI use cases

By agency-reported start year · click a year to filter
03<15'15'16'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25'26
Generative or agenticOther or unclassified8 of 8 records report a parseable start date

Start dates are agency-reported operational or pilot dates, not inventory submission dates. 2026 values are planned or early-year. Undated records are excluded from this chart only.

Sourcing

Reported for 100% of records

Each square is 1% of filtered records. Where reported, 88% involve in-house development.

High-impact AI

Agency self-designation under M-25-21Governance view
8records
Minimum practices · 8 high-impactin place
Pre-deployment testing100%
AI impact assessment100%
Independent review100%
Ongoing monitoring88%
Operator training100%
Fail-safe88%
Appeal process38%
User and public consultation25%
Reported in placeReported in progressNot applicableOther or ambiguous answer

High-impact is the agency's own classification, not an independent risk rating. No answer reported is missing evidence, not evidence that a practice is absent. 100% of high-impact records answer any practice question.

Analytical observations

Computed from the current filter; reproducible
  • Finding14% of reported deployed use cases (1 of 7) are classified as generative or agentic AI. View records
  • FindingOf 7 deployed high-impact use cases, 7 report a completed AI impact assessment and 0 leave every minimum-practice field blank. View records
  • InterpretationBlank practice fields are missing evidence, not evidence that a safeguard is absent. They mark where follow-up questions to the agency are most useful.
  • FindingSourcing is reported for 100% of use cases. Where reported, 88% involve in-house development.
AI classification reported100%
Stage not reported0
Sourcing reported100%