Federal AI Intelligence
Menu
Snapshot · OMB 2025 inventory · processed Oct 11, 2026
Federal AI landscape

Federal AI at a glance

2 agencies · 4 reported use cases · OMB 2025 Inventory. Portfolio size reflects reporting, not performance.

Executive briefing ↗Explore 4 use cases →
Agency
Stage
High-impact
Topic1
AI type1
Sourcing
Vendor
Function
Start year

Only records with a parseable start date match a year filter.

AI type: Computer visiontesting: blankTopic: Government Benefits Processing
4 Reported AI use cases2 agencies3 Deployed0 Pilots1 Designated high-impact
Decorative federal AI network visualization; not a representation of agency deployment locations or relationships.
Scale & composition

Agencies behind federal AI

Select an agency to explore
Ring shows composition · node area shows use cases
HHS2SSA2
In development/acquisition1Deployed3Largest portfolio: 2 · 2 agencies

Conceptual agency landscape · positions do not represent deployment locations. Proximity does not imply a relationship.

AI technology mix

Reported classification · click to cross-filter

0% generative or agentic. Each record carries one classification; not reported is shown hatched.

Mission areas

Topic area as reported

Lifecycle composition

4 records
Explore lifecycle stages and impact
Within each stageHigh-impact · Gen./agentic
Pre-deployment100%0%
Deployed0%0%

Impact and technology shares use each stage's records as the denominator.

From development and acquisition to retirement. Select a stage to explore its reported use cases.

Reading the inventory

Evidence, with its limits visible

0% of reported deployed use cases (0 of 3) are classified as generative or agentic AI.

Understand the methodology →

Evolution of reported AI use cases

By agency-reported start year · click a year to filter
0<15'15'16'17'18'19'201'211'22'231'24'25'26
Generative or agenticOther or unclassified3 of 4 records report a parseable start date

Start dates are agency-reported operational or pilot dates, not inventory submission dates. 2026 values are planned or early-year. Undated records are excluded from this chart only.

Sourcing

Reported for 75% of records

Each square is 1% of filtered records. Where reported, 67% involve in-house development.

High-impact AI

Agency self-designation under M-25-21Governance view
4records
Minimum practices · 1 high-impactin place
Pre-deployment testing0%
AI impact assessment0%
Independent review0%
Ongoing monitoring0%
Operator training0%
Fail-safe0%
Appeal process0%
User and public consultation0%
No answer reported

High-impact is the agency's own classification, not an independent risk rating. No answer reported is missing evidence, not evidence that a practice is absent. 0% of high-impact records answer any practice question.

Analytical observations

Computed from the current filter; reproducible
  • Finding0% of reported deployed use cases (0 of 3) are classified as generative or agentic AI. View records
  • FindingSourcing is reported for 75% of use cases. Where reported, 67% involve in-house development.
AI classification reported100%
Stage not reported0
Sourcing reported75%