Federal AI Intelligence
Menu
Snapshot · OMB 2025 inventory · processed Oct 11, 2026
Federal AI landscape

Federal AI at a glance

5 agencies · 32 reported use cases · OMB 2025 Inventory. Portfolio size reflects reporting, not performance.

Executive briefing ↗Explore 32 use cases →
Agency
Stage
High-impact1
Topic
AI type1
Sourcing1
Vendor
Function
Start year

Only records with a parseable start date match a year filter.

AI type: Generative AIHigh-impact: High-impactSourcing: Not reported
32 Reported AI use cases5 agencies0 Deployed0 Pilots32 Designated high-impact
Decorative federal AI network visualization; not a representation of agency deployment locations or relationships.
Scale & composition

Agencies behind federal AI

Select an agency to explore
Ring shows composition · node area shows use cases
DOE10VA9DOJ8DHS3
In development/acquisition32Largest portfolio: 10 · 5 agencies

Conceptual agency landscape · positions do not represent deployment locations. Proximity does not imply a relationship.

AI technology mix

Reported classification · click to cross-filter

100% generative or agentic. Each record carries one classification; not reported is shown hatched.

Mission areas

Topic area as reported

Lifecycle composition

32 records
Explore lifecycle stages and impact
Within each stageHigh-impact · Gen./agentic
Pre-deployment100%100%

Impact and technology shares use each stage's records as the denominator.

From development and acquisition to retirement. Select a stage to explore its reported use cases.

Reading the inventory

Evidence, with its limits visible

DOE, VA, DOJ report 27 of 32 use cases (84%).

Understand the methodology →

Evolution of reported AI use cases

By agency-reported start year · click a year to filter
No parseable start dates reported32 records in this view leave the start-date field blank or unparseable, so no timeline can be drawn from the source data.

Start dates are agency-reported operational or pilot dates, not inventory submission dates. 2026 values are planned or early-year. Undated records are excluded from this chart only.

Sourcing

Reported for 0% of records

Each square is 1% of filtered records. Where reported, n/a involve in-house development.

High-impact AI

Agency self-designation under M-25-21Governance view
32records
Minimum practices · 32 high-impactin place
Pre-deployment testing0%
AI impact assessment0%
Independent review0%
Ongoing monitoring0%
Operator training0%
Fail-safe0%
Appeal process0%
User and public consultation0%
No answer reported

High-impact is the agency's own classification, not an independent risk rating. No answer reported is missing evidence, not evidence that a practice is absent. 0% of high-impact records answer any practice question.

Analytical observations

Computed from the current filter; reproducible
  • FindingDOE, VA, DOJ report 27 of 32 use cases (84%).
  • FindingSourcing is reported for 0% of use cases. Where reported, n/a involve in-house development.
AI classification reported100%
Stage not reported0
Sourcing reported0%