Federal AI Intelligence
Menu
Snapshot · OMB 2025 inventory · processed Oct 11, 2026
Federal AI landscape

Federal AI at a glance

14 agencies · 51 reported use cases · OMB 2025 Inventory. Portfolio size reflects reporting, not performance.

Executive briefing ↗Explore 51 use cases →
Agency
Stage1
High-impact
Topic
AI type1
Sourcing1
Vendor
Function
Start year

Only records with a parseable start date match a year filter.

AI type: Generative AISourcing: Contract and in-houseStage: Pilot
51 Reported AI use cases14 agencies0 Deployed51 Pilots4 Designated high-impact
Decorative federal AI network visualization; not a representation of agency deployment locations or relationships.
Scale & composition

Agencies behind federal AI

Select an agency to explore
Ring shows composition · node area shows use cases
HHS20DOE14
Pilot51Largest portfolio: 20 · 14 agencies

Conceptual agency landscape · positions do not represent deployment locations. Proximity does not imply a relationship.

AI technology mix

Reported classification · click to cross-filter

100% generative or agentic. Each record carries one classification; not reported is shown hatched.

Mission areas

Topic area as reported

Lifecycle composition

51 records
Explore lifecycle stages and impact
Within each stageHigh-impact · Gen./agentic
Pilot8%100%

Impact and technology shares use each stage's records as the denominator.

From development and acquisition to retirement. Select a stage to explore its reported use cases.

Reading the inventory

Evidence, with its limits visible

HHS, DOE, TREAS report 37 of 51 use cases (73%).

Understand the methodology →

Evolution of reported AI use cases

By agency-reported start year · click a year to filter
0102030<15'15'16'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'2438'25'26
Generative or agenticOther or unclassified48 of 51 records report a parseable start date

Start dates are agency-reported operational or pilot dates, not inventory submission dates. 2026 values are planned or early-year. Undated records are excluded from this chart only.

Sourcing

Reported for 100% of records

Each square is 1% of filtered records. Where reported, 100% involve in-house development.

High-impact AI

Agency self-designation under M-25-21Governance view
51records
Minimum practices · 4 high-impactin place
Pre-deployment testing25%
AI impact assessment25%
Independent review25%
Ongoing monitoring0%
Operator training25%
Fail-safe25%
Appeal process0%
User and public consultation25%
Reported in placeReported in progressNot applicableNo answer reported

High-impact is the agency's own classification, not an independent risk rating. No answer reported is missing evidence, not evidence that a practice is absent. 25% of high-impact records answer any practice question.

Analytical observations

Computed from the current filter; reproducible
  • FindingHHS, DOE, TREAS report 37 of 51 use cases (73%).
  • FindingSourcing is reported for 100% of use cases. Where reported, 100% involve in-house development.
AI classification reported100%
Stage not reported0
Sourcing reported100%