Federal AI Intelligence
Menu
Snapshot · OMB 2025 inventory · processed Oct 11, 2026
Federal AI landscape

Federal AI at a glance

9 agencies · 16 reported use cases · OMB 2025 Inventory. Portfolio size reflects reporting, not performance.

Executive briefing ↗Explore 16 use cases →
Agency
Stage1
High-impact
Topic
AI type
Sourcing
Vendor
Function1
Start year

Only records with a parseable start date match a year filter.

Function: Chatbot or virtual assistantStage: Retired
16 Reported AI use cases9 agencies0 Deployed0 Pilots1 Designated high-impact
Decorative federal AI network visualization; not a representation of agency deployment locations or relationships.
Scale & composition

Agencies behind federal AI

Select an agency to explore
Ring shows composition · node area shows use cases
TREAS4HHS3VA2DOE2
Retired16Largest portfolio: 4 · 9 agencies

Conceptual agency landscape · positions do not represent deployment locations. Proximity does not imply a relationship.

AI technology mix

Reported classification · click to cross-filter

0% generative or agentic. Each record carries one classification; not reported is shown hatched.

Mission areas

Topic area as reported

Lifecycle composition

16 records
Explore lifecycle stages and impact
Within each stageHigh-impact · Gen./agentic
Retired6%0%

Impact and technology shares use each stage's records as the denominator.

From development and acquisition to retirement. Select a stage to explore its reported use cases.

Reading the inventory

Evidence, with its limits visible

TREAS, HHS, VA report 9 of 16 use cases (56%).

Understand the methodology →

Evolution of reported AI use cases

By agency-reported start year · click a year to filter
0<15'15'16'17'181'19'20'21'22'23'24'25'26
Generative or agenticOther or unclassified1 of 16 records report a parseable start date

Start dates are agency-reported operational or pilot dates, not inventory submission dates. 2026 values are planned or early-year. Undated records are excluded from this chart only.

Sourcing

Reported for 6% of records

Each square is 1% of filtered records. Where reported, 100% involve in-house development.

High-impact AI

Agency self-designation under M-25-21Governance view
16records
Minimum practices · 1 high-impactin place
Pre-deployment testing0%
AI impact assessment0%
Independent review0%
Ongoing monitoring0%
Operator training0%
Fail-safe0%
Appeal process0%
User and public consultation0%
No answer reported

High-impact is the agency's own classification, not an independent risk rating. No answer reported is missing evidence, not evidence that a practice is absent. 0% of high-impact records answer any practice question.

Analytical observations

Computed from the current filter; reproducible
  • FindingTREAS, HHS, VA report 9 of 16 use cases (56%).
  • FindingSourcing is reported for 6% of use cases. Where reported, 100% involve in-house development.
AI classification reported6%
Stage not reported0
Sourcing reported6%