Federal AI Intelligence
Menu
Snapshot · OMB 2025 inventory · processed Oct 11, 2026
Federal AI landscape

Federal AI at a glance

3 agencies · 19 reported use cases · OMB 2025 Inventory. Portfolio size reflects reporting, not performance.

Executive briefing ↗Explore 19 use cases →
Agency
Stage
High-impact1
Topic
AI type
Sourcing
Vendor
Function1
Start year

Only records with a parseable start date match a year filter.

Function: Document processing and extractionHigh-impact: High-impact
19 Reported AI use cases3 agencies11 Deployed3 Pilots19 Designated high-impact
Decorative federal AI network visualization; not a representation of agency deployment locations or relationships.
Scale & composition

Agencies behind federal AI

Select an agency to explore
Ring shows composition · node area shows use cases
DOJ9VA8DHS2
In development/acquisition5Pilot3Deployed11Largest portfolio: 9 · 3 agencies

Conceptual agency landscape · positions do not represent deployment locations. Proximity does not imply a relationship.

AI technology mix

Reported classification · click to cross-filter

21% generative or agentic. Each record carries one classification; not reported is shown hatched.

Mission areas

Topic area as reported

Lifecycle composition

19 records
Explore lifecycle stages and impact
Within each stageHigh-impact · Gen./agentic
Pre-deployment100%40%
Pilot100%67%
Deployed100%0%

Impact and technology shares use each stage's records as the denominator.

From development and acquisition to retirement. Select a stage to explore its reported use cases.

Reading the inventory

Evidence, with its limits visible

0% of reported deployed use cases (0 of 11) are classified as generative or agentic AI.

Understand the methodology →

Evolution of reported AI use cases

By agency-reported start year · click a year to filter
0<15'15'16'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'244'25'26
Generative or agenticOther or unclassified10 of 19 records report a parseable start date

Start dates are agency-reported operational or pilot dates, not inventory submission dates. 2026 values are planned or early-year. Undated records are excluded from this chart only.

Sourcing

Reported for 74% of records

Each square is 1% of filtered records. Where reported, 21% involve in-house development.

High-impact AI

Agency self-designation under M-25-21Governance view
19records
Minimum practices · 19 high-impactin place
Pre-deployment testing0%
AI impact assessment0%
Independent review0%
Ongoing monitoring0%
Operator training0%
Fail-safe0%
Appeal process0%
User and public consultation0%
Reported in progressOther or ambiguous answerNo answer reported

High-impact is the agency's own classification, not an independent risk rating. No answer reported is missing evidence, not evidence that a practice is absent. 42% of high-impact records answer any practice question.

Analytical observations

Computed from the current filter; reproducible
  • Finding0% of reported deployed use cases (0 of 11) are classified as generative or agentic AI. View records
  • FindingOf 11 deployed high-impact use cases, 0 report a completed AI impact assessment and 3 leave every minimum-practice field blank. View records
  • InterpretationBlank practice fields are missing evidence, not evidence that a safeguard is absent. They mark where follow-up questions to the agency are most useful.
  • FindingSourcing is reported for 74% of use cases. Where reported, 21% involve in-house development.
AI classification reported100%
Stage not reported0
Sourcing reported74%