Federal AI Intelligence
Menu
Snapshot · OMB 2025 inventory · processed Oct 11, 2026
Federal AI landscape

Federal AI at a glance

6 agencies · 13 reported use cases · OMB 2025 Inventory. Portfolio size reflects reporting, not performance.

Executive briefing ↗Explore 13 use cases →
Agency
Stage
High-impact1
Topic
AI type
Sourcing
Vendor
No options match.
Function1
Start year

Only records with a parseable start date match a year filter.

Function: Forecasting and predictionfeedback: blankHigh-impact: High-impact
13 Reported AI use cases6 agencies3 Deployed1 Pilots13 Designated high-impact
Decorative federal AI network visualization; not a representation of agency deployment locations or relationships.
Scale & composition

Agencies behind federal AI

Select an agency to explore
Ring shows composition · node area shows use cases
VA5DOJ2TREAS2DOE2
In development/acquisition9Pilot1Deployed3Largest portfolio: 5 · 6 agencies

Conceptual agency landscape · positions do not represent deployment locations. Proximity does not imply a relationship.

AI technology mix

Reported classification · click to cross-filter

31% generative or agentic. Each record carries one classification; not reported is shown hatched.

Mission areas

Topic area as reported

Lifecycle composition

13 records
Explore lifecycle stages and impact
Within each stageHigh-impact · Gen./agentic
Pre-deployment100%44%
Pilot100%0%
Deployed100%0%

Impact and technology shares use each stage's records as the denominator.

From development and acquisition to retirement. Select a stage to explore its reported use cases.

Reading the inventory

Evidence, with its limits visible

VA, DOJ, TREAS report 9 of 13 use cases (69%).

Understand the methodology →

Evolution of reported AI use cases

By agency-reported start year · click a year to filter
0<15'15'16'17'18'19'20'211'221'23'24'25'26
Generative or agenticOther or unclassified2 of 13 records report a parseable start date

Start dates are agency-reported operational or pilot dates, not inventory submission dates. 2026 values are planned or early-year. Undated records are excluded from this chart only.

Sourcing

Reported for 31% of records

Each square is 1% of filtered records. Where reported, 100% involve in-house development.

High-impact AI

Agency self-designation under M-25-21Governance view
13records
Minimum practices · 13 high-impactin place
Pre-deployment testing0%
AI impact assessment0%
Independent review0%
Ongoing monitoring0%
Operator training0%
Fail-safe0%
Appeal process0%
User and public consultation0%
No answer reported

High-impact is the agency's own classification, not an independent risk rating. No answer reported is missing evidence, not evidence that a practice is absent. 0% of high-impact records answer any practice question.

Analytical observations

Computed from the current filter; reproducible
  • FindingVA, DOJ, TREAS report 9 of 13 use cases (69%).
  • Finding0% of reported deployed use cases (0 of 3) are classified as generative or agentic AI. View records
  • FindingOf 3 deployed high-impact use cases, 0 report a completed AI impact assessment and 3 leave every minimum-practice field blank. View records
  • InterpretationBlank practice fields are missing evidence, not evidence that a safeguard is absent. They mark where follow-up questions to the agency are most useful.
  • FindingSourcing is reported for 31% of use cases. Where reported, 100% involve in-house development.
AI classification reported100%
Stage not reported0
Sourcing reported31%