Federal AI Intelligence
Menu
Snapshot · OMB 2025 inventory · processed Oct 11, 2026
Agency dossier · SSA

Social Security Administration

33 reported use cases, 0.9% of all federal records. Rank reflects what was reported, not performance.

#21by records#8by deployed#5by high-impact#6by completenessof 41 agencies
Reported use cases330.9% of all federal recordsDeployed2782%Pilots412%High-impact99 answered any practice question
Disclosure completeness99%Mean of 12 core fields

Technology portfolio

Click a segment for records
33use cases

Mission mix

Topic area as reported

Lifecycle

33 records
Within each stageHigh-impact · Gen./agentic
Pre-deployment0%100%
Pilot25%100%
Deployed30%33%

Lifecycle timeline

By agency-reported start year
0510<15'15'16'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'2412'25'26
Generative or agenticOther or unclassified32 of 33 records report a parseable start date

Position against all agencies

This agency vs the federal inventory
Deployed share82%vs 29%
High-impact share27%vs 12%
Generative or agentic45%vs 27%
Sourcing reported100%vs 44%
In-house development48%vs 28%
Disclosure completeness99%vs 67%

Cyan: SSA. Ring: all 3,611 records. Differences describe reporting, not quality.

Governance evidence

9 high-impact use cases · share reported in place
Pre-deployment testing89%
AI impact assessment89%
Independent review89%
Ongoing monitoring78%
Operator training89%
Fail-safe89%
Appeal process33%
User and public consultation33%
Reported in placeReported in progressNot applicablePrecluded by law or guidanceOther or ambiguous answerNo answer reported

No answer is missing evidence, not evidence that a safeguard is absent. Click a segment to open those records.

Sourcing and vendors

Sourcing reported for 100%

Related use cases

High-impact first, then deployed and most completeAll 33

Comparable portfolios

Most similar technology mix

Similarity is the cosine of each agency's AI-classification counts (unreported excluded); agencies with 10+ records. Click to compare side by side.

Operational functions

Keyword-derived tags

Field completeness vs. all agencies

Share of records with the field filled
Stage
100% vs 91%
High-impact designation
100% vs 88%
Topic area
100% vs 83%
AI classification
100% vs 82%
Problem
100% vs 84%
Benefits
100% vs 82%
Outputs
100% vs 79%
Sourcing
100% vs 44%
Start date
97% vs 39%
ATO
97% vs 43%
PII
97% vs 42%
Custom code
97% vs 47%

Bar: this agency. White tick: all agencies. A gap is a reporting gap, not a finding about the systems.

Bureaus and components

7 reported
Chief Information Officer1236%12 records · 36.4% of 33
Chief Information Officer, Analytics and Improvements824%8 records · 24.2% of 33
Chief Information Officer, Disability Information Systems412%4 records · 12.1% of 33
Human Resources412%4 records · 12.1% of 33
Chief Information Officer, Digital Customer Solutions39%3 records · 9.1% of 33
Chief Information Officer, System Operations and Hardware Engineering13%1 records · 3.0% of 33
Law and Policy, Disability Policy13%1 records · 3.0% of 33