Federal AI Intelligence
Menu
Snapshot · OMB 2025 inventory · processed Oct 11, 2026
Governance and accountability

Governance evidence

What agencies reported about the OMB M-25-21 minimum practices for high-impact AI. This is a disclosure analysis, not an audit, a compliance finding or an official assessment. An unanswered question is missing evidence, not evidence that a safeguard is absent.

Agency
Stage
High-impact
Topic1
AI type1
Sourcing
Vendor
Function
Start year

Only records with a parseable start date match a year filter.

AI type: Classical / predictive MLfailsafe: in_progressTopic: Health and Medical

Practice-by-practice evidence

Denominator: 6 records · use cases designated high-impact
Reported in progress
PracticeIn scopeIn placeIn progressNot in placeN/APrecluded or waivedOtherNo answerAnsweredIn place of applicable
Pre-deployment testing60600000100%0% of 6
AI impact assessment60600000100%0% of 6
Independent review60600000100%0% of 6
Ongoing monitoring60600000100%0% of 6
Operator training60600000100%0% of 6
Fail-safe60600000100%0% of 6
Appeal process60600000100%0% of 6
User and public consultation60600000100%0% of 6

Answered = records with any answer ÷ records in scope. In place of applicable = reported in place ÷ (in scope minus not applicable, precluded and waived). Unanswered records stay in that denominator, so the rate is a lower bound on reported evidence, not an estimate of real practice.

Agency-by-safeguard heatmap

Cell: share reported in place, among applicable recordsIn placeAnswered
Agency by governance practice
TestingImpact assess.Indep. reviewMonitoringTrainingFail-safeAppealConsultationn
DOJ0%0%0%0%0%0%0%0%6

Hatched cells: the agency answered nothing for that practice, so there is no evidence either way. Compare agencies with care: each agency is one reporting unit, and portfolios differ in size and type.

Records requiring further investigation

6 records with at least one practice unanswered or in progressOpen in explorer
Use caseStageTestAIAReviewMonitorTrainFail-safeAppealConsult
ASCVD (Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease) Risk Estimator
DOJ · DOJ-0142
DeployedReported in progressReported in progressReported in progressReported in progressReported in progressReported in progressReported in progressReported in progress
Automated Medication Dispensing Cabinet
DOJ · DOJ-0143
DeployedReported in progressReported in progressReported in progressReported in progressReported in progressReported in progressReported in progressReported in progress
Community Treatment Pipeline Screening
DOJ · DOJ-0149
DeployedReported in progressReported in progressReported in progressReported in progressReported in progressReported in progressReported in progressReported in progress
Medical Claims Adjudication
DOJ · DOJ-0156
DeployedReported in progressReported in progressReported in progressReported in progressReported in progressReported in progressReported in progressReported in progress
Medical Designations Calculator
DOJ · DOJ-0157
DeployedReported in progressReported in progressReported in progressReported in progressReported in progressReported in progressReported in progressReported in progress
Psychological Test Interpretation - Pearson Assessments
DOJ · DOJ-0161
DeployedReported in progressReported in progressReported in progressReported in progressReported in progressReported in progressReported in progressReported in progress

Unanswered analytical questions

Generated from the data; for follow-up with agencies
  1. 6 high-impact use cases are reported as deployed while their AI impact assessment is reported in progress. Was deployment authorised before the assessment was complete?
  2. 6 high-impact use cases report using PII but give no link to a Privacy Impact Assessment. Is a PIA published elsewhere?

These are questions the inventory raises but cannot answer. They are not findings of non-compliance.