Federal AI Intelligence
Menu
Snapshot · OMB 2025 inventory · processed Oct 11, 2026
Federal AI Intelligence · U.S. Government AI Observatory

Custom inventory report

Filter: topic = Cybersecurity; AI type = classical_ml; sourcing = unknown

Generated 2026-10-12 08:44 UTCDataset: 2025 Federal Agency AI Use Case Inventory (individually reported use cases), Office of Management and Budget (OMB). Version 2025-inventory@62d5baa65fa3, processed 2026-10-11, rules 2026.10.1. Static snapshot.Applied filters: topic = Cybersecurity; AI type = classical_ml; sourcing = unknown · 10 records

Key findings

  • 10 use-case records from 5 agencies: 2 deployed (20%), 0 pilots, 8 in development or acquisition, 0 retired, 0 with no stage reported.
  • 2 records are designated high-impact; 0 of them (0%) answered at least one minimum-practice question.
  • DHS, VA, GSA report 8 of 10 use cases (80%).
  • 0% of reported deployed use cases (0 of 2) are classified as generative or agentic AI.
  • Sourcing is reported for 0% of use cases. Where reported, n/a involve in-house development.

Lifecycle

StageRecordsShare
Deployed220%
Pre-deployment880%

AI technology

ClassificationRecordsShareDeployed
Classical / predictive ML10100%2

Agencies

AgencyRecordsDeployedHigh-impactCompleteness
DHS · Department of Homeland Security30058%
VA · Department of Veterans Affairs30258%
GSA · General Services Administration22033%
NASA · National Aeronautics and Space Administration10058%
NEA · National Endowment for the Arts10058%

High-impact designation

DesignationRecords
High-impact2
Presumed high-impact, determined not1
Not high-impact5
Not reported2

Governance evidence: use cases designated high-impact

PracticeIn placeIn progressNot in placeN/A or precludedOtherNo answerIn scope
Pre-deployment testing0000022
AI impact assessment0000022
Independent review0000022
Ongoing monitoring0000022
Operator training0000022
Fail-safe0000022
Appeal process0000022
User and public consultation0000022

"In place" means the agency reported the practice as established. "No answer" means the field was blank; it says nothing about whether the practice exists.

Method

All figures are computed directly from the normalised inventory records. Category labels are normalised from the source answer options; original values are kept on each record. Governance answers are classified as in place, in progress, not in place, not applicable, precluded, waived, other or no answer, and blanks are never read as "no". See the Methodology page for full rules.

Limitations

  • Figures are what agencies reported in the 2025 inventory. They are not verified, and registration of use cases is not complete for every agency.
  • A blank answer is missing evidence, not evidence that a practice or safeguard is absent.
  • Counts are use-case records. A larger portfolio does not indicate better performance or greater AI maturity, and agencies differ in how they split systems into use cases.
  • The inventory has no budget, cost, accuracy or outcome data. None is shown or inferred here.
  • This is a disclosure analysis. It is not an audit, a compliance determination or an official government assessment.

Source records

All 10 records.

RecordAgency IDAgencyUse caseStage
R1179GSAElastic Machine Learning Threat Detection (Phase 1)Deployed
R1180GSAElastic Machine Learning Threat Detection (Phase 2)Deployed
R0299NASA-578NASAAutonomous Network SecurityPre-deployment
R0554NEA-0001NEAManaging Cybersecurity ControlsPre-deployment
R1814DHS-417DHSMachine Learning Analysis Applied to Cyber Threat Hunt DataPre-deployment
R1819DHS-2446DHSCyber Threat DetectionPre-deployment
R1833DHS-107DHSMalware Reverse EngineeringPre-deployment
R2068VA-25-6956VACyber Authorization Memo GenerationPre-deployment
R2072VA-24-585VAForescout: AI Behavioral Anomaly Detection w/ Automated EnforcementPre-deployment
R2145VA-25-6903VAPolicy Knowledge BasePre-deployment

Prepared with Federal AI Intelligence by Irakli Petriashvili. Source: https://github.com/ombegov/2025-Federal-Agency-AI-Use-Case-Inventory