Technology landscape
How reported AI classifications spread across agencies, missions, lifecycle stages and sourcing. Each record carries one reported classification, so categories do not overlap. A classification describes the technique, not a specific commercial model.
Lifecycle by technology
Share of each technology's recordsDeployed: 32 (78.0%)Classical / predictive ML
Pilot: 2 (4.9%)Classical / predictive ML
Pre-deployment: 7 (17.1%)
Sourcing by technology
Where reportedContract and in-house: 1 (4.8%)Generative AI
Purchased from vendor: 12 (57.1%)Generative AI
Not reported: 8 (38.1%)
Developed in-house: 1 (2.4%)Classical / predictive ML
Contract and in-house: 2 (4.9%)Classical / predictive ML
Purchased from vendor: 31 (75.6%)Classical / predictive ML
Not reported: 7 (17.1%)
Developed in-house: 1 (4.5%)Natural language processing
Contract and in-house: 3 (13.6%)Natural language processing
Purchased from vendor: 11 (50.0%)Natural language processing
Not reported: 7 (31.8%)
Technology adoption by agency
Row share: each agency's records by classification · 16 largest portfolios in the filterTechnology by topic area
Row share within each topicHigh-impact designation by technology
Governance disclosure by technology
High-impact records: reported in place / scope| Technology | High-impact | Testing | Impact assess. | Indep. review | Monitoring | Training |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Generative AI | 21 | 0 / 21 | 0 / 21 | 0 / 21 | 0 / 21 | 0 / 21 |
| Classical / predictive ML | 41 | 0 / 41 | 0 / 41 | 0 / 41 | 0 / 41 | 0 / 41 |
| Natural language processing | 22 | 0 / 22 | 0 / 22 | 0 / 22 | 0 / 22 | 0 / 22 |
| Computer vision | 20 | 0 / 20 | 0 / 20 | 0 / 20 | 0 / 20 | 0 / 20 |
| Agentic AI | 1 | 0 / 1 | 0 / 1 | 0 / 1 | 0 / 1 | 0 / 1 |
| Not reported | 9 | 0 / 9 | 0 / 9 | 0 / 9 | 0 / 9 | 0 / 9 |
Shows counts reported in place against all high-impact records of that technology. The remainder includes in-progress, not applicable and unanswered. Full governance view
Systems, vendors and technology are different things
57 of 114 records name a vendor (50%)Vendor: the supplier the agency names in a free-text field. Matched to a standard list of companies; one record may name several.
System name: the agency's name for the system (reported for 70% of records).
AI classification: the technique category the agency selected. A vendor name does not show which model or technique is used, and this platform does not infer it.