Technology landscape
How reported AI classifications spread across agencies, missions, lifecycle stages and sourcing. Each record carries one reported classification, so categories do not overlap. A classification describes the technique, not a specific commercial model.
Lifecycle by technology
Share of each technology's recordsSourcing by technology
Where reportedDeveloped in-house: 14 (36.8%)Generative AI
Contract and in-house: 20 (52.6%)Generative AI
Purchased from vendor: 4 (10.5%)
Developed in-house: 6 (50.0%)Classical / predictive ML
Contract and in-house: 5 (41.7%)Classical / predictive ML
Purchased from vendor: 1 (8.3%)
Developed in-house: 18 (64.3%)Natural language processing
Contract and in-house: 7 (25.0%)Natural language processing
Purchased from vendor: 3 (10.7%)
Technology adoption by agency
Row share: each agency's records by classification · 16 largest portfolios in the filterTechnology by topic area
Row share within each topic| Generative AI | Classical / predictive ML | Natural language processing | Computer vision | Agentic AI | Other | n | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Administrative Functions | 33% | 22% | 41% | 4% | 27 | ||
| Health and Medical | 50% | 10% | 30% | 5% | 5% | 20 | |
| Information Technology | 45% | 10% | 35% | 10% | 20 | ||
| Science | 36% | 18% | 27% | 9% | 9% | 11 | |
| Law Enforcement | 100% | 2 | |||||
| Other | 50% | 50% | 2 | ||||
| Service Delivery | 50% | 50% | 2 | ||||
| Cybersecurity | 100% | 1 | |||||
| Emergency Management | 100% | 1 | |||||
| Government Benefits Processing | 100% | 1 | |||||
| Procurement and Financial Management | 100% | 1 |
High-impact designation by technology
Governance disclosure by technology
High-impact records: reported in place / scope| Technology | High-impact | Testing | Impact assess. | Indep. review | Monitoring | Training |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Generative AI | 0 | – | – | – | – | – |
| Classical / predictive ML | 0 | – | – | – | – | – |
| Natural language processing | 0 | – | – | – | – | – |
| Computer vision | 0 | – | – | – | – | – |
| Agentic AI | 0 | – | – | – | – | – |
| Other | 0 | – | – | – | – | – |
Shows counts reported in place against all high-impact records of that technology. The remainder includes in-progress, not applicable and unanswered. Full governance view
Systems, vendors and technology are different things
38 of 88 records name a vendor (43%)Vendor: the supplier the agency names in a free-text field. Matched to a standard list of companies; one record may name several.
System name: the agency's name for the system (reported for 55% of records).
AI classification: the technique category the agency selected. A vendor name does not show which model or technique is used, and this platform does not infer it.