Technology landscape
How reported AI classifications spread across agencies, missions, lifecycle stages and sourcing. Each record carries one reported classification, so categories do not overlap. A classification describes the technique, not a specific commercial model.
Lifecycle by technology
Share of each technology's recordsSourcing by technology
Where reportedDeveloped in-house: 2 (16.7%)Classical / predictive ML
Contract and in-house: 5 (41.7%)Classical / predictive ML
Purchased from vendor: 5 (41.7%)
Developed in-house: 5 (31.3%)Natural language processing
Contract and in-house: 6 (37.5%)Natural language processing
Purchased from vendor: 5 (31.3%)
Technology adoption by agency
Row share: each agency's records by classification · 16 largest portfolios in the filterTechnology by topic area
Row share within each topic| Generative AI | Classical / predictive ML | Natural language processing | Computer vision | Agentic AI | Other | n | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Administrative Functions | 14% | 36% | 29% | 21% | 14 | ||
| Health and Medical | 36% | 21% | 29% | 7% | 7% | 14 | |
| Law Enforcement | 18% | 9% | 73% | 11 | |||
| Government Benefits Processing | 29% | 29% | 43% | 7 | |||
| Other | 20% | 40% | 20% | 20% | 5 | ||
| Information Technology | 33% | 33% | 33% | 3 | |||
| Science | 50% | 50% | 2 | ||||
| Human Resources | 100% | 1 | |||||
| Service Delivery | 100% | 1 | |||||
| Transportation | 100% | 1 |
High-impact designation by technology
High-impact: 3 (18.8%)Natural language processing
Not high-impact: 13 (81.3%)
Governance disclosure by technology
High-impact records: reported in place / scope| Technology | High-impact | Testing | Impact assess. | Indep. review | Monitoring | Training |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Generative AI | 0 | – | – | – | – | – |
| Classical / predictive ML | 2 | 0 / 2 | 0 / 2 | 0 / 2 | 0 / 2 | 0 / 2 |
| Natural language processing | 3 | 0 / 3 | 0 / 3 | 0 / 3 | 0 / 3 | 0 / 3 |
| Computer vision | 6 | 0 / 6 | 0 / 6 | 0 / 6 | 0 / 6 | 0 / 6 |
| Agentic AI | 0 | – | – | – | – | – |
| Other | 0 | – | – | – | – | – |
Shows counts reported in place against all high-impact records of that technology. The remainder includes in-progress, not applicable and unanswered. Full governance view
Systems, vendors and technology are different things
42 of 59 records name a vendor (71%)Vendor: the supplier the agency names in a free-text field. Matched to a standard list of companies; one record may name several.
System name: the agency's name for the system (reported for 75% of records).
AI classification: the technique category the agency selected. A vendor name does not show which model or technique is used, and this platform does not infer it.