Federal AI Intelligence
Menu
Snapshot · OMB 2025 inventory · processed Oct 11, 2026
Technology landscape

Technology landscape

How reported AI classifications spread across agencies, missions, lifecycle stages and sourcing. Each record carries one reported classification, so categories do not overlap. A classification describes the technique, not a specific commercial model.

Agency
Stage
High-impact
Topic
AI type
Sourcing
Vendor
Function1
Start year

Only records with a parseable start date match a year filter.

Function: Summarizationtesting: blank

Lifecycle by technology

Share of each technology's records
DeployedPilotPre-deploymentRetiredNot reported
Generative AI104
Classical / predictive ML13
Natural language processing34
Computer vision3
Agentic AI3
Other2
Not reported19

Sourcing by technology

Where reported
Developed in-houseContract and in-housePurchased from vendorNot reported
Generative AI104
Classical / predictive ML13
Natural language processing34
Computer vision3
Agentic AI3
Other2
Not reported19

Technology adoption by agency

Row share: each agency's records by classification · 16 largest portfolios in the filter
Agency by AI classification
Generative AIClassical / predictive MLNatural language processingComputer visionAgentic AIOtherNot reportedn
HHS60%3%27%7%3%30
VA53%11%32%5%19
DOJ41%6%47%6%17
DHS88%6%6%16
TREAS92%8%12
SEC78%22%9
ED100%9
DOE100%8
DOL86%14%7
DOI50%33%17%6
STATE50%33%17%6
FHFA75%25%4
NASA75%25%4
USDA50%50%4
NSF100%3
FCC100%3

Technology by topic area

Row share within each topic
Topic by AI classification
Generative AIClassical / predictive MLNatural language processingComputer visionAgentic AIOtherNot reportedn
Administrative Functions80%7%14%44
Information Technology79%4%13%4%24
Law Enforcement47%41%12%17
Health and Medical43%50%7%14
Service Delivery64%14%21%14
Other58%8%17%17%12
Science42%33%17%8%12
Emergency Management33%17%50%6
Procurement and Financial Management83%17%6
Energy and the Environment100%4
Government Benefits Processing75%25%4
Cybersecurity100%1
Transportation100%1

High-impact designation by technology

High-impactPresumed high-impact, determined notNot high-impactNot reported
Generative AI104
Classical / predictive ML13
Natural language processing34
Computer vision3
Agentic AI3
Other2
Not reported19

Governance disclosure by technology

High-impact records: reported in place / scope
TechnologyHigh-impactTestingImpact assess.Indep. reviewMonitoringTraining
Generative AI80 / 80 / 80 / 80 / 80 / 8
Classical / predictive ML10 / 10 / 10 / 10 / 10 / 1
Natural language processing80 / 80 / 80 / 80 / 80 / 8
Computer vision10 / 10 / 10 / 10 / 10 / 1
Agentic AI10 / 10 / 10 / 10 / 10 / 1
Other0–––––
Not reported0–––––

Shows counts reported in place against all high-impact records of that technology. The remainder includes in-progress, not applicable and unanswered. Full governance view

Systems, vendors and technology are different things

46 of 178 records name a vendor (26%)
Microsoft1818 recordsOpenAI1010 recordsAmazon Web Services55 recordsPalantir44 recordsGoogle33 recordsCredal22 recordsLexisNexis22 recordsAccenture11 recordsAnthropic11 recordsAsk Sage11 recordsBooz Allen Hamilton11 recordsCrowdStrike11 recordsDeloitte11 recordsGuidehouse11 recordsMeta11 records

Vendor: the supplier the agency names in a free-text field. Matched to a standard list of companies; one record may name several.

System name: the agency's name for the system (reported for 28% of records).

AI classification: the technique category the agency selected. A vendor name does not show which model or technique is used, and this platform does not infer it.