Technology landscape
How reported AI classifications spread across agencies, missions, lifecycle stages and sourcing. Each record carries one reported classification, so categories do not overlap. A classification describes the technique, not a specific commercial model.
Lifecycle by technology
Share of each technology's recordsSourcing by technology
Where reportedTechnology adoption by agency
Row share: each agency's records by classification · 16 largest portfolios in the filterTechnology by topic area
Row share within each topic| Generative AI | Classical / predictive ML | Natural language processing | Computer vision | Agentic AI | Other | Not reported | n | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Administrative Functions | 72% | 11% | 17% | 18 | ||||
| Information Technology | 67% | 8% | 17% | 8% | 12 | |||
| Law Enforcement | 45% | 55% | 11 | |||||
| Service Delivery | 67% | 22% | 11% | 9 | ||||
| Health and Medical | 29% | 57% | 14% | 7 | ||||
| Science | 29% | 43% | 14% | 14% | 7 | |||
| Other | 80% | 20% | 5 | |||||
| Emergency Management | 33% | 67% | 3 | |||||
| Procurement and Financial Management | 67% | 33% | 3 | |||||
| Government Benefits Processing | 100% | 2 | ||||||
| Cybersecurity | 100% | 1 | ||||||
| Transportation | 100% | 1 |
High-impact designation by technology
High-impact: 5 (10.9%)Generative AI
Presumed high-impact, determined not: 1 (2.2%)Generative AI
Not high-impact: 39 (84.8%)Generative AI
Not reported: 1 (2.2%)
Presumed high-impact, determined not: 1 (11.1%)Classical / predictive ML
Not high-impact: 8 (88.9%)
High-impact: 7 (35.0%)Natural language processing
Not high-impact: 13 (65.0%)
Governance disclosure by technology
High-impact records: reported in place / scope| Technology | High-impact | Testing | Impact assess. | Indep. review | Monitoring | Training |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Generative AI | 5 | 0 / 5 | 0 / 5 | 0 / 5 | 0 / 5 | 0 / 5 |
| Classical / predictive ML | 0 | – | – | – | – | – |
| Natural language processing | 7 | 0 / 7 | 0 / 7 | 0 / 7 | 0 / 7 | 0 / 7 |
| Computer vision | 0 | – | – | – | – | – |
| Agentic AI | 1 | 0 / 1 | 0 / 1 | 0 / 1 | 0 / 1 | 0 / 1 |
| Other | 0 | – | – | – | – | – |
| Not reported | 0 | – | – | – | – | – |
Shows counts reported in place against all high-impact records of that technology. The remainder includes in-progress, not applicable and unanswered. Full governance view
Systems, vendors and technology are different things
2 of 81 records name a vendor (2%)Vendor: the supplier the agency names in a free-text field. Matched to a standard list of companies; one record may name several.
System name: the agency's name for the system (reported for 4% of records).
AI classification: the technique category the agency selected. A vendor name does not show which model or technique is used, and this platform does not infer it.