Technology landscape
How reported AI classifications spread across agencies, missions, lifecycle stages and sourcing. Each record carries one reported classification, so categories do not overlap. A classification describes the technique, not a specific commercial model.
Lifecycle by technology
Share of each technology's recordsSourcing by technology
Where reportedContract and in-house: 1 (4.3%)Generative AI
Purchased from vendor: 4 (17.4%)Generative AI
Not reported: 18 (78.3%)
Developed in-house: 1 (25.0%)Classical / predictive ML
Not reported: 3 (75.0%)
Technology adoption by agency
Row share: each agency's records by classification · 16 largest portfolios in the filterTechnology by topic area
Row share within each topic| Generative AI | Classical / predictive ML | Natural language processing | Computer vision | Agentic AI | Other | n | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 69% | 15% | 8% | 8% | 13 | ||
| Law Enforcement | 27% | 9% | 55% | 9% | 11 | ||
| Administrative Functions | 43% | 14% | 29% | 14% | 7 | ||
| Science | 17% | 50% | 17% | 17% | 6 | ||
| Service Delivery | 50% | 50% | 6 | ||||
| Health and Medical | 50% | 25% | 25% | 4 | |||
| Other | 67% | 33% | 3 | ||||
| Transportation | 100% | 3 | |||||
| Energy and the Environment | 100% | 1 | |||||
| Government Benefits Processing | 100% | 1 |
High-impact designation by technology
High-impact: 4 (22.2%)Natural language processing
Presumed high-impact, determined not: 2 (11.1%)Natural language processing
Not high-impact: 12 (66.7%)
Governance disclosure by technology
High-impact records: reported in place / scope| Technology | High-impact | Testing | Impact assess. | Indep. review | Monitoring | Training |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Generative AI | 4 | 0 / 4 | 0 / 4 | 0 / 4 | 0 / 4 | 0 / 4 |
| Classical / predictive ML | 1 | 0 / 1 | 0 / 1 | 0 / 1 | 0 / 1 | 0 / 1 |
| Natural language processing | 4 | 0 / 4 | 0 / 4 | 0 / 4 | 0 / 4 | 0 / 4 |
| Computer vision | 0 | – | – | – | – | – |
| Agentic AI | 0 | – | – | – | – | – |
| Other | 0 | – | – | – | – | – |
Shows counts reported in place against all high-impact records of that technology. The remainder includes in-progress, not applicable and unanswered. Full governance view
Systems, vendors and technology are different things
6 of 55 records name a vendor (11%)Vendor: the supplier the agency names in a free-text field. Matched to a standard list of companies; one record may name several.
System name: the agency's name for the system (reported for 11% of records).
AI classification: the technique category the agency selected. A vendor name does not show which model or technique is used, and this platform does not infer it.