Technology landscape
How reported AI classifications spread across agencies, missions, lifecycle stages and sourcing. Each record carries one reported classification, so categories do not overlap. A classification describes the technique, not a specific commercial model.
Lifecycle by technology
Share of each technology's recordsSourcing by technology
Where reportedDeveloped in-house: 4 (66.7%)Classical / predictive ML
Contract and in-house: 1 (16.7%)Classical / predictive ML
Purchased from vendor: 1 (16.7%)
Technology adoption by agency
Row share: each agency's records by classification · 16 largest portfolios in the filterTechnology by topic area
Row share within each topic| Generative AI | Classical / predictive ML | Natural language processing | Computer vision | n | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Administrative Functions | 100% | 10 | |||
| Law Enforcement | 29% | 14% | 57% | 7 | |
| Service Delivery | 60% | 40% | 5 | ||
| Information Technology | 100% | 4 | |||
| Cybersecurity | 50% | 50% | 2 | ||
| Government Benefits Processing | 100% | 1 | |||
| Other | 100% | 1 | |||
| Procurement and Financial Management | 100% | 1 |
High-impact designation by technology
High-impact: 2 (66.7%)Natural language processing
Not high-impact: 1 (33.3%)
Governance disclosure by technology
High-impact records: reported in place / scope| Technology | High-impact | Testing | Impact assess. | Indep. review | Monitoring | Training |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Generative AI | 0 | – | – | – | – | – |
| Classical / predictive ML | 3 | 3 / 3 | 2 / 3 | 2 / 3 | 3 / 3 | 3 / 3 |
| Natural language processing | 2 | 2 / 2 | 1 / 2 | 1 / 2 | 1 / 2 | 1 / 2 |
| Computer vision | 4 | 4 / 4 | 4 / 4 | 4 / 4 | 4 / 4 | 4 / 4 |
Shows counts reported in place against all high-impact records of that technology. The remainder includes in-progress, not applicable and unanswered. Full governance view
Systems, vendors and technology are different things
24 of 31 records name a vendor (77%)Vendor: the supplier the agency names in a free-text field. Matched to a standard list of companies; one record may name several.
System name: the agency's name for the system (reported for 97% of records).
AI classification: the technique category the agency selected. A vendor name does not show which model or technique is used, and this platform does not infer it.