Technology landscape
How reported AI classifications spread across agencies, missions, lifecycle stages and sourcing. Each record carries one reported classification, so categories do not overlap. A classification describes the technique, not a specific commercial model.
Lifecycle by technology
Share of each technology's recordsSourcing by technology
Where reportedDeveloped in-house: 1 (2.2%)Generative AI
Contract and in-house: 3 (6.7%)Generative AI
Purchased from vendor: 41 (91.1%)
Developed in-house: 1 (2.6%)Classical / predictive ML
Contract and in-house: 4 (10.5%)Classical / predictive ML
Purchased from vendor: 33 (86.8%)
Developed in-house: 1 (5.0%)Natural language processing
Contract and in-house: 4 (20.0%)Natural language processing
Purchased from vendor: 15 (75.0%)
Technology adoption by agency
Row share: each agency's records by classification · 16 largest portfolios in the filterTechnology by topic area
Row share within each topic| Generative AI | Classical / predictive ML | Natural language processing | Computer vision | Agentic AI | Other | n | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law Enforcement | 12% | 34% | 22% | 30% | 1% | 73 | |
| Information Technology | 94% | 3% | 3% | 33 | |||
| Administrative Functions | 22% | 44% | 11% | 22% | 9 | ||
| Health and Medical | 13% | 75% | 13% | 8 | |||
| Energy and the Environment | 67% | 33% | 3 | ||||
| Cybersecurity | 100% | 1 | |||||
| Human Resources | 100% | 1 | |||||
| Other | 100% | 1 | |||||
| Service Delivery | 100% | 1 |
High-impact designation by technology
High-impact: 17 (85.0%)Natural language processing
Not high-impact: 3 (15.0%)
Governance disclosure by technology
High-impact records: reported in place / scope| Technology | High-impact | Testing | Impact assess. | Indep. review | Monitoring | Training |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Generative AI | 11 | 1 / 11 | 0 / 11 | 0 / 11 | 1 / 11 | 1 / 11 |
| Classical / predictive ML | 36 | 3 / 36 | 0 / 36 | 0 / 36 | 3 / 36 | 2 / 36 |
| Natural language processing | 17 | 2 / 17 | 0 / 17 | 0 / 17 | 0 / 17 | 1 / 17 |
| Computer vision | 25 | 4 / 25 | 0 / 25 | 0 / 25 | 2 / 25 | 2 / 25 |
| Agentic AI | 1 | 0 / 1 | 0 / 1 | 0 / 1 | 0 / 1 | 0 / 1 |
| Other | 0 | – | – | – | – | – |
Shows counts reported in place against all high-impact records of that technology. The remainder includes in-progress, not applicable and unanswered. Full governance view
Systems, vendors and technology are different things
108 of 130 records name a vendor (83%)Vendor: the supplier the agency names in a free-text field. Matched to a standard list of companies; one record may name several.
System name: the agency's name for the system (reported for 95% of records).
AI classification: the technique category the agency selected. A vendor name does not show which model or technique is used, and this platform does not infer it.