Federal AI Intelligence
Menu
Snapshot · OMB 2025 inventory · processed Oct 11, 2026
Technology landscape

Technology landscape

How reported AI classifications spread across agencies, missions, lifecycle stages and sourcing. Each record carries one reported classification, so categories do not overlap. A classification describes the technique, not a specific commercial model.

Agency
Stage
High-impact
Topic
AI type
Sourcing
Vendor
Function
Start year

Only records with a parseable start date match a year filter.

independent_review: in_progressmonitoring: in_progress

Lifecycle by technology

Share of each technology's records
DeployedPilotPre-deploymentRetiredNot reported
Generative AI54
Classical / predictive ML47
Natural language processing21
Computer vision23
Agentic AI1

Sourcing by technology

Where reported
Developed in-houseContract and in-housePurchased from vendorNot reported
Generative AI54
Classical / predictive ML47
Natural language processing21
Computer vision23
Agentic AI1

Technology adoption by agency

Row share: each agency's records by classification · 16 largest portfolios in the filter
Agency by AI classification
Generative AIClassical / predictive MLNatural language processingComputer visionAgentic AIn
DOJ12%43%21%23%1%75
DOE84%11%5%38
SBA59%41%17
DHS9%9%27%55%11
DOI33%67%3
TREAS50%50%2

Technology by topic area

Row share within each topic
Topic by AI classification
Generative AIClassical / predictive MLNatural language processingComputer visionAgentic AIn
Law Enforcement13%34%23%30%1%71
Information Technology91%3%6%34
Service Delivery73%27%11
Administrative Functions38%38%13%13%8
Health and Medical86%14%7
Energy and the Environment80%20%5
Cybersecurity25%75%4
Other50%50%2
Science100%2
Human Resources100%1
Procurement and Financial Management100%1

High-impact designation by technology

High-impactPresumed high-impact, determined notNot high-impactNot reported
Generative AI54
Classical / predictive ML47
Natural language processing21
Computer vision23
Agentic AI1

Governance disclosure by technology

High-impact records: reported in place / scope
TechnologyHigh-impactTestingImpact assess.Indep. reviewMonitoringTraining
Generative AI100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 10
Classical / predictive ML330 / 330 / 330 / 330 / 330 / 33
Natural language processing172 / 170 / 170 / 170 / 171 / 17
Computer vision232 / 230 / 230 / 230 / 230 / 23
Agentic AI10 / 10 / 10 / 10 / 10 / 1

Shows counts reported in place against all high-impact records of that technology. The remainder includes in-progress, not applicable and unanswered. Full governance view

Systems, vendors and technology are different things

118 of 146 records name a vendor (81%)
Microsoft3131 recordsAxon55 recordsServiceNow55 recordsSAS44 recordsThomson Reuters33 recordsVeritone33 recordsAmazon Web Services22 recordsGoogle22 recordsLexisNexis22 recordsMotorola Solutions22 recordsOpenAI22 recordsPalantir22 recordsCellebrite11 recordsClearview AI11 recordsDeloitte11 records

Vendor: the supplier the agency names in a free-text field. Matched to a standard list of companies; one record may name several.

System name: the agency's name for the system (reported for 92% of records).

AI classification: the technique category the agency selected. A vendor name does not show which model or technique is used, and this platform does not infer it.