Technology landscape
How reported AI classifications spread across agencies, missions, lifecycle stages and sourcing. Each record carries one reported classification, so categories do not overlap. A classification describes the technique, not a specific commercial model.
Lifecycle by technology
Share of each technology's recordsSourcing by technology
Where reportedDeveloped in-house: 3 (30.0%)Generative AI
Contract and in-house: 2 (20.0%)Generative AI
Purchased from vendor: 5 (50.0%)
Developed in-house: 21 (65.6%)Classical / predictive ML
Contract and in-house: 6 (18.8%)Classical / predictive ML
Purchased from vendor: 5 (15.6%)
Technology adoption by agency
Row share: each agency's records by classification · 16 largest portfolios in the filterTechnology by topic area
Row share within each topic| Generative AI | Classical / predictive ML | Natural language processing | Computer vision | n | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law Enforcement | 36% | 4% | 60% | 25 | |
| Administrative Functions | 44% | 22% | 22% | 11% | 9 |
| Government Benefits Processing | 14% | 86% | 7 | ||
| Information Technology | 43% | 43% | 14% | 7 | |
| Science | 100% | 6 | |||
| Other | 25% | 25% | 50% | 4 | |
| Transportation | 67% | 33% | 3 | ||
| Energy and the Environment | 50% | 50% | 2 | ||
| Procurement and Financial Management | 100% | 2 | |||
| Emergency Management | 100% | 1 | |||
| Health and Medical | 100% | 1 |
High-impact designation by technology
High-impact: 18 (56.3%)Classical / predictive ML
Not high-impact: 14 (43.8%)
High-impact: 2 (28.6%)Natural language processing
Not high-impact: 5 (71.4%)
Governance disclosure by technology
High-impact records: reported in place / scope| Technology | High-impact | Testing | Impact assess. | Indep. review | Monitoring | Training |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Generative AI | 4 | 2 / 4 | 3 / 4 | 3 / 4 | 2 / 4 | 4 / 4 |
| Classical / predictive ML | 18 | 18 / 18 | 16 / 18 | 16 / 18 | 18 / 18 | 18 / 18 |
| Natural language processing | 2 | 2 / 2 | 1 / 2 | 1 / 2 | 1 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Computer vision | 17 | 17 / 17 | 15 / 17 | 15 / 17 | 17 / 17 | 17 / 17 |
Shows counts reported in place against all high-impact records of that technology. The remainder includes in-progress, not applicable and unanswered. Full governance view
Systems, vendors and technology are different things
41 of 67 records name a vendor (61%)Vendor: the supplier the agency names in a free-text field. Matched to a standard list of companies; one record may name several.
System name: the agency's name for the system (reported for 79% of records).
AI classification: the technique category the agency selected. A vendor name does not show which model or technique is used, and this platform does not infer it.