Federal AI Intelligence
Menu
Snapshot · OMB 2025 inventory · processed Oct 11, 2026
USDA · USDA-025 · record R1330

Video Surveillance System

Department of Agriculture · Office of Safety, Security, and Protection

Overview

Development stage
DeployedSource: c) Deployed – The use case is being actively authorized or utilized to support the functions or mission of an agency.
High-impact designation
High-impactSource: a) High-impact
Impact justification
Not reported
Start date
2020-02-14 (day precision)Source: 2/14/2020
Withheld from public reporting
Not reported

Mission

Topic area
Administrative Functions
Operational functions
Biometrics and identity Derived by keyword rules; see methodology

Problem the AI is intended to solve

The purpose of this system is to conduct facial recognition video surveillance to provide enhanced security.

Expected benefits

Benefits include reduced labor hours for technicians and enhanced surveillance capability.

System outputs

The system outputs a positive match to the security control center, indicating identification of the selected individual. An alarm notification is sent to alert security personnel.

Technology

AI classification
Computer visionSource: Computer Vision: AI that processes and interprets visual data (e.g., images and videos).
System name(s)
Video Surveillance System
Custom-developed code
No
Public source code
Not reported

Sourcing

How it was built
Contract and in-houseSource: c) Developed with both contracting and in-house resources
Vendor (as reported)
GlobalComm
Vendors (standardized)
None on the standard list

A vendor is the supplier named by the agency. It does not identify the underlying model or AI technology.

Data and privacy

Involves PII
No
Privacy Impact Assessment
Not reported
Authorization to Operate
Yes
Demographic features
k) None of the above
Training and evaluation data
Vendor trained and evaluated the system using their own private data assets.
Federal Data Catalog
Not reported

Governance

8 of 8 minimum-practice questions answered. A blank answer means the agency reported nothing; it does not mean the practice is absent.

Pre-deployment testingReported in placeSource: a) Yes
AI impact assessmentReported in progressSource: b) In-progress
Independent reviewReported in progressSource: d) In-progress
Ongoing monitoringReported in placeSource: a) Yes, sufficient monitoring protocols have been established
Operator trainingReported in placeSource: a) Yes, sufficient and periodic training has been established
Fail-safeReported in placeSource: a) Yes
Appeal processReported in placeSource: a) Yes, an appropriate appeal process has been established
User and public consultationOther or ambiguous answerSource: d) Other

Potential impacts and how they were identified

Potential impacts identified by vendor - Positive impacts include improved security and threat management. Potential adverse impacts include misidentification of an individual.