Forest Mapping using G-LiHT airborne data in interior Alaska
Department of Agriculture · Natural Resources and Environment
Overview
- Development stage
- PilotSource: b) Pilot – The use case has been deployed in a limited test or pilot capacity.
- High-impact designation
- Not high-impactSource: c) Not high-impact
- Impact justification
- Not reported
- Start date
- 2014-06-01 (day precision)Source: 6/1/2014
- Withheld from public reporting
- Not reported
Mission
- Topic area
- Science
- Operational functions
- No function tag matched Derived by keyword rules; see methodology
Problem the AI is intended to solve
This project supports the first comprehensive forest inventory of interior Alaska in the modern era. Machine learning techniques will be used to predict various forest attributes (volume, biomass, composition).
Expected benefits
Use of multi-sensor airborne data will improve the accuracy and precision of forest inventory estimates over interior Alaska, improving the quality and reliability of products provided to the public.
System outputs
Maps and tabular estimates of inventory attributes over all forested regions of interior Alaska.
Technology
- AI classification
- Classical / predictive MLSource: Classical/Predictive Machine Learning: Models trained on data to make predictions or classifications based on identified patterns or relatio…
- System name(s)
- Not reported
- Custom-developed code
- Yes
- Public source code
- Not reported
Sourcing
- How it was built
- Developed in-houseSource: b) Developed in-house
- Vendor (as reported)
- Not reported
- Vendors (standardized)
- None on the standard list
A vendor is the supplier named by the agency. It does not identify the underlying model or AI technology.
Data and privacy
- Involves PII
- No
- Privacy Impact Assessment
- Not reported
- Authorization to Operate
- No
- Demographic features
- k) None of the above
- Training and evaluation data
- Airborne remote sensing data and Forest Inventory and Analysis field inventory data.
- Federal Data Catalog
- Not reported
Governance
0 of 8 minimum-practice questions answered. A blank answer means the agency reported nothing; it does not mean the practice is absent.
Potential impacts and how they were identified
Not reported