ChatBot
Department of Justice · Department of Justice / COPS
Overview
- Development stage
- DeployedSource: c) Deployed – The use case is being actively authorized or utilized to support the functions or mission of an agency.
- High-impact designation
- Not high-impactSource: c) Not high-impact
- Impact justification
- Does not produce an output that serves as a principal basis for decisions or actions with legal, material, binding, or significant effect on any of the individuals or entities identified in OMB-25-21.
- Start date
- 2021-11 (month precision)Source: 11/2021
- Withheld from public reporting
- NoSource: a) No
Mission
- Topic area
- Information Technology
- Operational functions
- Chatbot or virtual assistant Derived by keyword rules; see methodology
Problem the AI is intended to solve
The Chatbot responds to the questions, allowing staff to focus on other priorities.
Expected benefits
The Intelligent Bot tool is implemented using Question and Answer (QnA) Maker and the Language Understanding (LUIS) services which is developed using the Microsoft Azure Software As A Service (SAAS) infrastructure in the Cloud on the COPS website. This will allow COPS to easily implement a brand new knowledge base of questions and answers feature on the site which will respond via a chat box based on a question entered by the customer.
System outputs
Response
Technology
- AI classification
- Classical / predictive MLSource: Classical/Predictive Machine Learning: Models trained on data to make predictions or classifications based on identified patterns or relatio…
- System name(s)
- Redacted for cybersecurity purposes.
- Custom-developed code
- Yes
- Public source code
- Not reported
Sourcing
- How it was built
- Developed in-houseSource: b) Developed in-house
- Vendor (as reported)
- Not reported
- Vendors (standardized)
- None on the standard list
A vendor is the supplier named by the agency. It does not identify the underlying model or AI technology.
Data and privacy
- Involves PII
- No
- Privacy Impact Assessment
- Not reported
- Authorization to Operate
- No
- Demographic features
- k) None of the above
- Training and evaluation data
- The case owner relied on DOJ AI governance practices to select and prepare data, as well as evaluate performance.
- Federal Data Catalog
- Not reported
Governance
0 of 8 minimum-practice questions answered. A blank answer means the agency reported nothing; it does not mean the practice is absent.
Potential impacts and how they were identified
Not reported