Data & Analytics: Threat and Security Incident Monitoring

Overview

Development stage

PilotSource: b) Pilot – The use case has been deployed in a limited test or pilot capacity.

High-impact designation

Presumed high-impact, determined notSource: b) Presumed high-impact, but determined not high impact

Impact justification

Does not produce an output that serves as a principal basis for decisions or actions with legal, material, binding, or significant effect on any of the individuals or entities identified in OMB-25-21.

Start date

2024-01 (month precision)Source: 01/2024

Withheld from public reporting

NoSource: a) No

Mission

Topic area

Law Enforcement

Operational functions

No function tag matched Derived by keyword rules; see methodology

Problem the AI is intended to solve

DEA wants to improve its real-time collaboration, executive protection, and agent safety with data-driven situational awareness, and identify potential threats using entity resolution to analyze multiple commercial and government data feeds.

Expected benefits

This use case enables DEA to gain key insights at exponentially higher speeds with lower costs by fusing variety of data sources on potential threats from both insiders and external actors and to assist internal monitoring of multiple devices for real-time collaboration. This use case provides entity resolution, taking information entered by DEA analysts and scanning data sources for likely matches with risk indicators, and returning those results to analysts for review.

System outputs

Outputs vary by use case.

Technology

AI classification

Generative AISource: Generative AI: AI that generates new or synthetic content (e.g., images, videos, audio, text, code).

System name(s)

Redacted for cybersecurity purposes.

Custom-developed code

No

Public source code

Not reported

Sourcing

How it was built

Purchased from vendorSource: a) Purchased from a vendor

Vendor (as reported)

Not reported

Vendors (standardized)

None on the standard list

A vendor is the supplier named by the agency. It does not identify the underlying model or AI technology.

Data and privacy

Involves PII

Yes

Privacy Impact Assessment

Not reported

Authorization to Operate

No

Demographic features

k) None of the above

Training and evaluation data

The case owner relied on DOJ AI governance practices to select and prepare data, as well as evaluate performance.

Federal Data Catalog

Not reported

Governance

0 of 8 minimum-practice questions answered. A blank answer means the agency reported nothing; it does not mean the practice is absent.

Potential impacts and how they were identified

Not reported