Enabling eDiscovery Platform AI
Department of Justice · Department of Justice / CIV
Overview
- Development stage
- In development or acquisitionSource: a) Pre-deployment – The use case is in a development or acquisition status.
- High-impact designation
- Not high-impactSource: c) Not high-impact
- Impact justification
- Does not produce an output that serves as a principal basis for decisions or actions with legal, material, binding, or significant effect on any of the individuals or entities identified in OMB-25-21.
- Start date
- Not reported
- Withheld from public reporting
- NoSource: a) No
Mission
- Topic area
- Information Technology
- Operational functions
- Document processing and extraction, Claims and case processing Derived by keyword rules; see methodology
Problem the AI is intended to solve
Migrate CORA data to Relativity One or Everlaw, cloud based solutions to enable Relativity's and Everlaw's AI tools for review prioritization, privilege review and other advanced eDiscovery utilities. Utilize internal or third party-tools for AI-assisted collection and data processing, including image and voice recognition and analysis of complex data formats. Integrate E-Discovery tools into case management processes. This initiative transforms litigation support capabilities by leveraging AI to accelerate document review processes, reduce discovery costs, and improve case preparation efficiency and effectiveness.
Expected benefits
(1) Increases data availability and accessibility for integration with AI platforms through hosting on a scalable platform, in alignment with DOJ Data Strategy Goal #1 "Enterprise Data Management." Creates replicable enterprise capabilities that other DOJ components can adopt. (2) Allows migration to our existing environments more quickly. Discovery process will be streamlined with increased prioritization of review and lessens the time for manual privilege reviews. (3) AI enabled workflows available to Division litigating teams for privilege review, case strategy and prioritized document review.
System outputs
Prioritizations, Classifications, Recommendations: document priority rankings, privilege classifications, review recommendations.
Technology
- AI classification
- Classical / predictive MLSource: Classical/Predictive Machine Learning: Models trained on data to make predictions or classifications based on identified patterns or relatio…
- System name(s)
- Not reported
- Custom-developed code
- Not reported
- Public source code
- Not reported
Sourcing
- How it was built
- Not reported
- Vendor (as reported)
- Not reported
- Vendors (standardized)
- None on the standard list
A vendor is the supplier named by the agency. It does not identify the underlying model or AI technology.
Data and privacy
- Involves PII
- Not reported
- Privacy Impact Assessment
- Not reported
- Authorization to Operate
- Not reported
- Demographic features
- Not reported
- Training and evaluation data
- Not reported
- Federal Data Catalog
- Not reported
Governance
0 of 8 minimum-practice questions answered. A blank answer means the agency reported nothing; it does not mean the practice is absent.
Potential impacts and how they were identified
Not reported