DOJ · DOJ-0329 · record R1754

Audio and Written Transcription and Translation

Department of Justice · Department of Justice / DEA

Overview

Development stage: PilotSource: b) Pilot – The use case has been deployed in a limited test or pilot capacity.
High-impact designation: High-impactSource: a) High-impact
Impact justification: Not reported
Start date: 2024-01 (month precision)Source: 01/2024
Withheld from public reporting: NoSource: a) No

Mission

Topic area: Law Enforcement
Operational functions: Translation and transcription Derived by keyword rules; see methodology

Problem the AI is intended to solve

This technology automates the transcription and translation of Spanish and Mandarin Chinese audio files from lawfully seized devices and authorized communications.

Expected benefits

The immediate benefits are speed and lower cost, and to enable investigators to quickly identify which parts of the conversations should be reviewed and interpreted by human translators.

System outputs

Outputs transcription of the original language and the English translation with speaker differentiations including search results of the predetermined relevant terms defined by the analyst.

Technology

AI classification: Classical / predictive MLSource: Classical/Predictive Machine Learning: Models trained on data to make predictions or classifications based on identified patterns or relatio…
System name(s): Redacted for cybersecurity purposes.
Custom-developed code: Yes
Public source code: Not reported

Sourcing

How it was built: Contract and in-houseSource: c) Developed with both contracting and in-house resources
Vendor (as reported): MIT Lincoln Laboratory
Vendors (standardized): None on the standard list

A vendor is the supplier named by the agency. It does not identify the underlying model or AI technology.

Data and privacy

Involves PII: Yes
Privacy Impact Assessment: Not reported
Authorization to Operate: No
Demographic features: This AI use case utilizes one or more of the demographic variables listed in compliance with all federal laws and agency regulations.
Training and evaluation data: The case owner relied on DOJ AI governance practices to select and prepare data, as well as evaluate performance.
Federal Data Catalog: Not reported

Governance

0 of 8 minimum-practice questions answered. A blank answer means the agency reported nothing; it does not mean the practice is absent.

Pre-deployment testingNo answer reported

AI impact assessmentNo answer reported

Independent reviewNo answer reported

Ongoing monitoringNo answer reported

Operator trainingNo answer reported

Fail-safeNo answer reported

Appeal processNo answer reported

User and public consultationNo answer reported

Potential impacts and how they were identified

Not reported