Federal AI Intelligence
Menu
Snapshot · OMB 2025 inventory · processed Oct 11, 2026
DHS · DHS-2721 · record R1793

AI Resume & ATS App

Department of Homeland Security · FEMA

Overview

Development stage
In development or acquisitionSource: a) Pre-deployment – The use case is in a development or acquisition status.
High-impact designation
High-impactSource: a) High-impact
Impact justification
Not reported
Start date
Not reported
Withheld from public reporting
Not reported

Mission

Topic area
Human Resources
Operational functions
Risk scoring and triage, HR and workforce Derived by keyword rules; see methodology

Problem the AI is intended to solve

Speed and scale: During disasters, resume volume spikes and manual review can’t keep up; Format variability: Resumes arrive as PDFs, Word files, text, and scans, making uniform processing difficult; Consistency: Different reviewers apply criteria differently, leading to uneven shortlists and missed candidates; Traceability and defensibility: Hiring choices must be fast, explainable, and audit ready; Searchability: Teams need to quickly find candidates with specific qualifications (for example, 5+ years of EMS experience); Centralization: Candidate information is scattered across files and events, slowing coordination and handoffs.

Expected benefits

How AI helps: Reads every format: Scans and reads PDFs, Word files, text, and images so all resumes can be processed; Extracts key details: Pulls out skills, certifications, education, locations, roles, dates, and years of experience from free form text; Understands the job: Reads job descriptions, separates must have and nice to have qualifications and applies appropriate weights; Matches and scores: Compares each resume to the job and calculates a clear match score; Ranks candidates: Sorts candidates by score to produce a prioritized shortlist; Highlights strengths and weaknesses: Summarizes where a candidate aligns well and where they fall short; Flags critical gaps: Calls out missing must have requirements (for example, licenses, certifications, clearances, or minimum years); Explains results: Shows the evidence behind each recommendation, what matched and what didn’t; Conversational search (optional): Lets HR ask plain language questions about the candidate pool (for example, “Show EMS candidates with 5+ years in Region 2”); Human oversight: Routes sensitive or low confidence cases to HR/SMEs for review before moving forward. Benefits: Faster: Processes resumes in seconds and handles very large volumes during surge events; More consistent: Applies the same criteria to every resume, reducing variation across reviewers; Better decisions: Ranked lists with clear reasons improve triage and interview selection; More efficient: Cuts manual screening time so staff can focus on final se-lection and onboarding; Transparent and reviewable: Captures inputs, scores, explanations, and reviewer actions to support audits and continuous improvement.

System outputs

Structured candidate profiles: Standard fields (skills, certifications, education, location, years of experience) enable fair comparison and precise search/filtering; Ranked lists with match scores: Orders candidates by fit to required and preferred qualifications for fast, defensible shortlisting; Clear explanations: Shows the specific evidence behind each score, including matched items and gaps, to support transparent decisions; Gap/mismatch flags: Highlights missing or insufficient requirements to speed triage and targeted follow up; Dashboards and exportable reports: Filters (for example, location, availability, qualifications) that help HR slice results and coordinate next steps; Optional human in the loop checks: Configurable SME/HR validation for high impact roles or edge cases, maintaining human control over outcomes.

Technology

AI classification
Natural language processingSource: Natural Language Processing: AI that processes, interprets, and shares information in human language.
System name(s)
Not reported
Custom-developed code
Not reported
Public source code
Not reported

Sourcing

How it was built
Not reported
Vendor (as reported)
Not reported
Vendors (standardized)
None on the standard list

A vendor is the supplier named by the agency. It does not identify the underlying model or AI technology.

Data and privacy

Involves PII
Not reported
Privacy Impact Assessment
Not reported
Authorization to Operate
Not reported
Demographic features
Not reported
Training and evaluation data
Not reported
Federal Data Catalog
Not reported

Governance

0 of 8 minimum-practice questions answered. A blank answer means the agency reported nothing; it does not mean the practice is absent.

Pre-deployment testingNo answer reported
AI impact assessmentNo answer reported
Independent reviewNo answer reported
Ongoing monitoringNo answer reported
Operator trainingNo answer reported
Fail-safeNo answer reported
Appeal processNo answer reported
User and public consultationNo answer reported

Potential impacts and how they were identified

Not reported