Federal AI Intelligence
Menu
Snapshot · OMB 2025 inventory · processed Oct 11, 2026
DHS · DHS-2724 · record R1840

Program Integrity (RRAD-PI) AI Counter-Fraud Enhancement Measures

Department of Homeland Security · FEMA

Overview

Development stage
In development or acquisitionSource: a) Pre-deployment – The use case is in a development or acquisition status.
High-impact designation
Not high-impactSource: c) Not high-impact
Impact justification
Not reported
Start date
Not reported
Withheld from public reporting
Not reported

Mission

Topic area
Service Delivery
Operational functions
Fraud, waste and improper payments, Biometrics and identity, Risk scoring and triage Derived by keyword rules; see methodology

Problem the AI is intended to solve

The AI use case aims to further expand and address RRAD-PI’s fraud detection and prevention challenges within disaster recovery programs. Specifically, it seeks to mitigate fraudulent activities, identity theft, and deceptive practices that compromise program integrity, ensuring that resources are allocated efficiently and equitably to eligible individuals and entities.

Expected benefits

The expected benefits include: • Enhanced Fraud Detection: Improved identification of fraudulent activities, reducing financial losses and ensuring program integrity. • Operational Efficiency: Automation of manual processes, such as document review and identity verification, leading to faster application processing and reduced administrative burden. • Proactive Fraud Prevention: Early detection of fraud risks enables timely intervention, minimizing harm and protecting public funds. • Improved Resource Allocation: Ensures disaster recovery resources are distributed to legitimate recipients, fostering public trust in government programs. • Cross-Agency Collaboration: Facilitates secure data sharing across agencies, enabling a unified approach to combating fraud schemes that span jurisdictions. • Public Confidence: Strengthened program integrity enhances public trust in the agency’s ability to manage disaster recovery efforts effectively.

System outputs

The AI model/system may generate outputs such as: • Fraud Risk Scores: Quantitative assessments of fraud likelihood for transactions, applications, or entities. • Anomaly Alerts: Notifications of unusual patterns or behaviors indicative of potential fraud. • Network Maps: Visual representations of relationships between entities, highlighting connections to fraudulent actors. • Document Analysis Reports: Summaries of inconsistencies, deceptive language, or forgery detected in submitted documents. • Real-Time Monitoring Flags: Alerts for suspicious activities requiring immediate intervention. • Behavioral Biometrics Insights: Reports on user behavior anomalies, such as unusual typing patterns or device usage. • Image/Video Verification Results: Validation of authenticity for submitted visual evidence. • Threat Intelligence Updates: Integration of external threat data into fraud detection models. • Geospatial Analysis Findings: Location-based discrepancies in claims, such as mismatched disaster relief applications. • Cross-Agency Fraud Insights: Aggregated data analysis highlighting fraud schemes across jurisdictions.

Technology

AI classification
Classical / predictive MLSource: Classical/Predictive Machine Learning: Models trained on data to make predictions or classifications based on identified patterns or relatio…
System name(s)
Not reported
Custom-developed code
Not reported
Public source code
Not reported

Sourcing

How it was built
Not reported
Vendor (as reported)
Not reported
Vendors (standardized)
None on the standard list

A vendor is the supplier named by the agency. It does not identify the underlying model or AI technology.

Data and privacy

Involves PII
Not reported
Privacy Impact Assessment
Not reported
Authorization to Operate
Not reported
Demographic features
Not reported
Training and evaluation data
Not reported
Federal Data Catalog
Not reported

Governance

0 of 8 minimum-practice questions answered. A blank answer means the agency reported nothing; it does not mean the practice is absent.

Pre-deployment testingNo answer reported
AI impact assessmentNo answer reported
Independent reviewNo answer reported
Ongoing monitoringNo answer reported
Operator trainingNo answer reported
Fail-safeNo answer reported
Appeal processNo answer reported
User and public consultationNo answer reported

Potential impacts and how they were identified

Not reported