Federal AI Intelligence
Menu
Snapshot · OMB 2025 inventory · processed Oct 11, 2026
DHS · DHS-37 · record R1931

Automated Item of Interest Detection

Department of Homeland Security · CBP

Overview

Development stage
DeployedSource: c) Deployed – The use case is being actively authorized or utilized to support the functions or mission of an agency.
High-impact designation
Presumed high-impact, determined notSource: b) Presumed high-impact, but determined not high impact
Impact justification
The AI outputs do not serve as a principal basis for a decision or action concerning a specific individual or entity that has a legal, material, binding, or similarly significant effect on that individual’s or entity’s civil rights, civil liberties or privacy, equal opportunities, or access to or the ability to apply for critical government resources or services. The AI runs on video and images captured from lawfully deployed technologies used to support the U.S. Border Patrol mission between Ports of Entry. The AI provides alerts when it detects the presence of an IoI, such as persons, vehicles, animals in the image frame. With regard to persons, this computer vision application is trained to determine if the object in the image frame is a person with a certain of level of confidence and not another object that may be shaped similarly to a person. After the alert of a detection, a trained agent or user, reviews the image to identify and classify the activity taking place. The AI merely alerts to the presence of an item it was trained to detect.
Start date
2020-01-31 (day precision)Source: 2020-01-31T00:00:00
Withheld from public reporting
Not reported

Mission

Topic area
Law Enforcement
Operational functions
No function tag matched Derived by keyword rules; see methodology

Problem the AI is intended to solve

The software is designed to analyze photographs and video feeds captured by field imaging equipment for review by U.S. Border Patrol (USBP) agents and personnel. Using proprietary software, the system processes and annotates images to identify whether they contain human subjects, animals, or vehicles. The system is designed to incorporate future enhancements that expand its detection capabilities and to improve accuracy based on user feedback.

Expected benefits

The software analyzes images and video that are taken by operationally deployed equipment, which are then fed into CBP systems for review by USBP agents, Office of Field Operations (OFO) officers, and other CBP users. It provides quick identification of people either crossing into the U.S. at a time and place other than designated for entry, circumventing security at a port of entry, or those already inside the U.S. trying to elude capture, as well as the ability for human operators to quickly determine if subjects in an image are, in fact, human.

System outputs

The system creates a layer which is overlaid over the image to produce a box around items of interest it has determined to be likely human beings.

Technology

AI classification
Classical / predictive MLSource: Classical/Predictive Machine Learning: Models trained on data to make predictions or classifications based on identified patterns or relatio…
System name(s)
I4 Viewer
Custom-developed code
Yes
Public source code
Not reported

Sourcing

How it was built
Contract and in-houseSource: c) Developed with both contracting and in-house resources
Vendor (as reported)
Matroid
Vendors (standardized)
None on the standard list

A vendor is the supplier named by the agency. It does not identify the underlying model or AI technology.

Data and privacy

Involves PII
No
Privacy Impact Assessment
Not reported
Authorization to Operate
Yes
Demographic features
Not reported
Training and evaluation data
All of the image data fed to the models are owned by USBP.
Federal Data Catalog
Not reported

Governance

0 of 8 minimum-practice questions answered. A blank answer means the agency reported nothing; it does not mean the practice is absent.

Pre-deployment testingNo answer reported
AI impact assessmentNo answer reported
Independent reviewNo answer reported
Ongoing monitoringNo answer reported
Operator trainingNo answer reported
Fail-safeNo answer reported
Appeal processNo answer reported
User and public consultationNo answer reported

Potential impacts and how they were identified

Not reported