Federal AI Intelligence
Menu
Snapshot · OMB 2025 inventory · processed Oct 11, 2026
DHS · DHS-56 · record R1952

Person-Centric Identity Services Information Compilation Check

Department of Homeland Security · USCIS

Overview

Development stage
DeployedSource: c) Deployed – The use case is being actively authorized or utilized to support the functions or mission of an agency.
High-impact designation
Presumed high-impact, determined notSource: b) Presumed high-impact, but determined not high impact
Impact justification
This use case verifies the ongoing accuracy of information compiled from within the Person-Centric Identity Services (PCIS). It identifies which records from within PCIS best match search criteria to support case processing. ------ The AI outputs do not serve as a principal basis for a decision or action concerning a specific individual or entity that has a legal, material, binding, or similarly significant effect on that individual’s or entity’s civil rights, civil liberties or privacy, equal opportunities, or access to or the ability to apply for critical government resources or services. The use case compiles records from across a variety of USCIS systems to provide a comprehensive history of a person’s interaction with USCIS. The output of this can be visualized through a report or dashboard to assist with case review ensuring access to helpful and accurate records. Adjudicators review the outputs of this use case, alongside other information and insights, to process a case and make a final determination. The adjudication process can be conducted without this tool, however, doing so would significantly increase the time and effort required to process immigration requests.
Start date
2022-07-01 (day precision)Source: 2022-07-01T00:00:00
Withheld from public reporting
Not reported

Mission

Topic area
Law Enforcement
Operational functions
No function tag matched Derived by keyword rules; see methodology

Problem the AI is intended to solve

The output of the use case is the numerical confidence score which is used to determine the validity of the A-number presented in search results. The confidence score identifies which records from within PCIS best match search criteria for an A-number.

Expected benefits

The aim of this use case is to leverage machine learning to test the accuracy of PCIS to identify and manage associations between individuals and their assigned A-numbers, which is a unique 7, 8, or 9 digit number assigned to a noncitizen by DHS. The A-Number plays a critical role in surfacing of a person and all their associated records from across PCIS.

System outputs

Numerical likelihood score which is used to determine the validity of the A# presented. Likelihood scores are subjected to a high threshold (.98, maximum 1) to assess whether the A# presented belongs to the individual.

Technology

AI classification
Classical / predictive MLSource: Classical/Predictive Machine Learning: Models trained on data to make predictions or classifications based on identified patterns or relatio…
System name(s)
Person Centric Identity Services
Custom-developed code
Yes
Public source code
Not reported

Sourcing

How it was built
Contract and in-houseSource: c) Developed with both contracting and in-house resources
Vendor (as reported)
MetroIBR
Vendors (standardized)
None on the standard list

A vendor is the supplier named by the agency. It does not identify the underlying model or AI technology.

Data and privacy

Involves PII
Yes
Privacy Impact Assessment
www.dhs.gov ↗
Authorization to Operate
Yes
Demographic features
Not reported
Training and evaluation data
USCIS-only data derived from 7 form-processing source systems including C3, ELIS, CPMS, GLOBAL, CIS2, AR-11, CAMINO.
Federal Data Catalog
Not reported

Governance

0 of 8 minimum-practice questions answered. A blank answer means the agency reported nothing; it does not mean the practice is absent.

Pre-deployment testingNo answer reported
AI impact assessmentNo answer reported
Independent reviewNo answer reported
Ongoing monitoringNo answer reported
Operator trainingNo answer reported
Fail-safeNo answer reported
Appeal processNo answer reported
User and public consultationNo answer reported

Potential impacts and how they were identified

Not reported