Federal AI Intelligence
Menu
Snapshot · OMB 2025 inventory · processed Oct 11, 2026
DHS · DHS-106 · record R1963

Critical Infrastructure Network Anomaly Detection

Department of Homeland Security · CISA

Overview

Development stage
DeployedSource: c) Deployed – The use case is being actively authorized or utilized to support the functions or mission of an agency.
High-impact designation
Not high-impactSource: c) Not high-impact
Impact justification
Not reported
Start date
2022-01-10 (day precision)Source: 2022-01-10T00:00:00
Withheld from public reporting
Not reported

Mission

Topic area
Cybersecurity
Operational functions
Cyber threat detection, Forecasting and prediction, Risk scoring and triage Derived by keyword rules; see methodology

Problem the AI is intended to solve

CyberSentry currently ingests hundreds of terabytes of data from Critical Infrastructure Partners every single day. At petabyte-scale over all collected network data, CyberSentry required a way to filter through the noise to be able to detect Advanced Persistent Threat (APT) and Nation State malicious activity happening within our Partners' networks. CyberSentry has developed numerous machine learning-based detections to identify trends, patterns, and anomalies in network data that ultimately result in both automated and manual triage by analysts.

Expected benefits

This use case delivers improved internal government tools for hunting and detection of malicious threat actors on critical infrastructure networks. It automates manual data fusion and correlation processes and highlights potential anomalies, allowing CISA analysts to focus more time on hunting adversaries.

System outputs

An interface is provided for analysts to query cybersecurity data, and dashboards are provided with potential cybersecurity alerts, including anomalies detected through predictive models and rule-based heuristics.

Technology

AI classification
Classical / predictive MLSource: Classical/Predictive Machine Learning: Models trained on data to make predictions or classifications based on identified patterns or relatio…
System name(s)
CISA Technical Engagement Network
Custom-developed code
Yes
Public source code
Not reported

Sourcing

How it was built
Developed in-houseSource: b) Developed in-house
Vendor (as reported)
Not reported
Vendors (standardized)
None on the standard list

A vendor is the supplier named by the agency. It does not identify the underlying model or AI technology.

Data and privacy

Involves PII
No
Privacy Impact Assessment
www.dhs.gov ↗
Authorization to Operate
Yes
Demographic features
Not reported
Training and evaluation data
Cybersecurity cloud, network and host logs; Cybersecurity threat intelligence (CTI)
Federal Data Catalog
Not reported

Governance

0 of 8 minimum-practice questions answered. A blank answer means the agency reported nothing; it does not mean the practice is absent.

Pre-deployment testingNo answer reported
AI impact assessmentNo answer reported
Independent reviewNo answer reported
Ongoing monitoringNo answer reported
Operator trainingNo answer reported
Fail-safeNo answer reported
Appeal processNo answer reported
User and public consultationNo answer reported

Potential impacts and how they were identified

Not reported