Federal AI Intelligence
Menu
Snapshot · OMB 2025 inventory · processed Oct 11, 2026
DHS · DHS-2605 · record R1987

Lexis Nexis

Department of Homeland Security · TSA

Overview

Development stage
DeployedSource: c) Deployed – The use case is being actively authorized or utilized to support the functions or mission of an agency.
High-impact designation
Not high-impactSource: c) Not high-impact
Impact justification
Not reported
Start date
2024-09-23 (day precision)Source: 2024-09-23T00:00:00
Withheld from public reporting
Not reported

Mission

Topic area
Transportation
Operational functions
Fraud, waste and improper payments, Biometrics and identity Derived by keyword rules; see methodology

Problem the AI is intended to solve

Identity verification for passenger screening and bolster transportation security.

Expected benefits

Lexis Nexis assists TSA Analysts in identity verification for passenger screening and bolster transportation security.

System outputs

The AI outputs are in the form of a person, vehicular, or dwelling report that is custom based on analysts inputs and selections. These reports are used by TSA to assist in the verification of traveler identities detecting fraudulent documents and ensuring compliance with security protocols.

Technology

AI classification
Generative AISource: Generative AI: AI that generates new or synthetic content (e.g., images, videos, audio, text, code).
System name(s)
Not reported
Custom-developed code
No
Public source code
Not reported

Sourcing

How it was built
Purchased from vendorSource: a) Purchased from a vendor
Vendor (as reported)
REX DBA Lexis Nexis
Vendors (standardized)
LexisNexis

A vendor is the supplier named by the agency. It does not identify the underlying model or AI technology.

Data and privacy

Involves PII
No
Privacy Impact Assessment
Not reported
Authorization to Operate
No
Demographic features
Not reported
Training and evaluation data
AI models are trained using a combination of open web content and proprietary LexisNexis content to ensure high-quality, relevant outputs. Evaluations occur through regular internal and external audits, customer feedback and reviews, and incident response.
Federal Data Catalog
Not reported

Governance

0 of 8 minimum-practice questions answered. A blank answer means the agency reported nothing; it does not mean the practice is absent.

Pre-deployment testingNo answer reported
AI impact assessmentNo answer reported
Independent reviewNo answer reported
Ongoing monitoringNo answer reported
Operator trainingNo answer reported
Fail-safeNo answer reported
Appeal processNo answer reported
User and public consultationNo answer reported

Potential impacts and how they were identified

Not reported