Federal AI Intelligence
Menu
Snapshot · OMB 2025 inventory · processed Oct 11, 2026
DHS · DHS-57 · record R2001

Identity Match Option (IMO) Tool for Record Compilation

Department of Homeland Security · USCIS

Overview

Development stage
RetiredSource: d) Retired – The use case was reported in the agency’s prior year’s inventory, but its development and/or use has since been discontinued.
High-impact designation
Presumed high-impact, determined notSource: b) Presumed high-impact, but determined not high impact
Impact justification
The use case compiles records from across a variety of USCIS systems to provide a comprehensive history of a person’s interaction with USCIS. The AI output can be visualized through a report or dashboard to assist with case review ensuring access to useful and accurate records. (SEE DHS CAIO SUPER MEMO FY24) ------ The AI outputs do not serve as a principal basis for a decision or action concerning a specific individual or entity that has a legal, material, binding, or similarly significant effect on that individual’s or entity’s civil rights, civil liberties or privacy, equal opportunities, or access to or the ability to apply for critical government resources or services. The use case compiles records from across a variety of USCIS systems to provide a comprehensive history of a person’s interaction with USCIS. The output of this can be visualized through a report or dashboard to assist with case review ensuring access to helpful and accurate records. Adjudicators review the outputs of this use case, alongside other information and insights, to process a case and make a final determination. The adjudication process can be conducted without this tool, however, doing so would significantly increase the time and effort required to process immigration requests.
Start date
Not reported
Withheld from public reporting
Not reported

Mission

Topic area
Not reported
Operational functions
No function tag matched Derived by keyword rules; see methodology

Problem the AI is intended to solve

Not reported

Expected benefits

Not reported

System outputs

Not reported

Technology

AI classification
Not reported
System name(s)
Not reported
Custom-developed code
Not reported
Public source code
Not reported

Sourcing

How it was built
Not reported
Vendor (as reported)
Not reported
Vendors (standardized)
None on the standard list

A vendor is the supplier named by the agency. It does not identify the underlying model or AI technology.

Data and privacy

Involves PII
Not reported
Privacy Impact Assessment
Not reported
Authorization to Operate
Not reported
Demographic features
Not reported
Training and evaluation data
Not reported
Federal Data Catalog
Not reported

Governance

0 of 8 minimum-practice questions answered. A blank answer means the agency reported nothing; it does not mean the practice is absent.

Pre-deployment testingNo answer reported
AI impact assessmentNo answer reported
Independent reviewNo answer reported
Ongoing monitoringNo answer reported
Operator trainingNo answer reported
Fail-safeNo answer reported
Appeal processNo answer reported
User and public consultationNo answer reported

Potential impacts and how they were identified

Not reported