DHS · DHS-57 · record R2001
Identity Match Option (IMO) Tool for Record Compilation
Department of Homeland Security · USCIS
Overview
- Development stage
- RetiredSource: d) Retired – The use case was reported in the agency’s prior year’s inventory, but its development and/or use has since been discontinued.
- High-impact designation
- Presumed high-impact, determined notSource: b) Presumed high-impact, but determined not high impact
- Impact justification
- The use case compiles records from across a variety of USCIS systems to provide a comprehensive history of a person’s interaction with USCIS. The AI output can be visualized through a report or dashboard to assist with case review ensuring access to useful and accurate records. (SEE DHS CAIO SUPER MEMO FY24) ------ The AI outputs do not serve as a principal basis for a decision or action concerning a specific individual or entity that has a legal, material, binding, or similarly significant effect on that individual’s or entity’s civil rights, civil liberties or privacy, equal opportunities, or access to or the ability to apply for critical government resources or services. The use case compiles records from across a variety of USCIS systems to provide a comprehensive history of a person’s interaction with USCIS. The output of this can be visualized through a report or dashboard to assist with case review ensuring access to helpful and accurate records. Adjudicators review the outputs of this use case, alongside other information and insights, to process a case and make a final determination. The adjudication process can be conducted without this tool, however, doing so would significantly increase the time and effort required to process immigration requests.
- Start date
- Not reported
- Withheld from public reporting
- Not reported
Mission
- Topic area
- Not reported
- Operational functions
- No function tag matched Derived by keyword rules; see methodology
Problem the AI is intended to solve
Not reported
Expected benefits
Not reported
System outputs
Not reported
Technology
- AI classification
- Not reported
- System name(s)
- Not reported
- Custom-developed code
- Not reported
- Public source code
- Not reported
Sourcing
- How it was built
- Not reported
- Vendor (as reported)
- Not reported
- Vendors (standardized)
- None on the standard list
A vendor is the supplier named by the agency. It does not identify the underlying model or AI technology.
Data and privacy
- Involves PII
- Not reported
- Privacy Impact Assessment
- Not reported
- Authorization to Operate
- Not reported
- Demographic features
- Not reported
- Training and evaluation data
- Not reported
- Federal Data Catalog
- Not reported
Governance
0 of 8 minimum-practice questions answered. A blank answer means the agency reported nothing; it does not mean the practice is absent.
Pre-deployment testingNo answer reported
AI impact assessmentNo answer reported
Independent reviewNo answer reported
Ongoing monitoringNo answer reported
Operator trainingNo answer reported
Fail-safeNo answer reported
Appeal processNo answer reported
User and public consultationNo answer reported
Potential impacts and how they were identified
Not reported