Preparation of Brownfields Success Stories
Environmental Protection Agency · Region 1
Overview
- Development stage
- PilotSource: b) Pilot – The use case has been deployed in a limited test or pilot capacity.
- High-impact designation
- Not high-impactSource: c) Not high-impact
- Impact justification
- The output of this AI use case does not serve as a principal basis for decisions or actions that have a legal, material, binding, or significant effect on rights or safety.
- Start date
- 2025-08-15 (day precision)Source: 08/15/2025 00:00:00
- Withheld from public reporting
- NoSource: a) No
Mission
- Topic area
- Administrative Functions
- Operational functions
- Summarization Derived by keyword rules; see methodology
Problem the AI is intended to solve
Preparing draft Brownfields success stories involves compiling and summarizing extensive data from technical reports about site history and environmental assessment/cleanup ads well as financial information about cleanup costs, grant funds, leveraged public/private investment, and jobs leveraged. this information comes from many different sources and can be much more quickly collected and compiled by using AI.
Expected benefits
By leveraging AI to do the heavy lifting of collecting and compiling the data, we can focus our efforts more on the narrative aspect of the success stories and shorten the overall amount of time it takes to prepare stories and publish them on our website, where they can provide inspiration and ideas to other communities who may be struggling with brownfield-related challenges of their own.
System outputs
First draft of text for a Brownfields success story ultimately intended for public viewing on our regional Brownfields program web page. Prompt engineering includes specified format, word count, reading level, writing style, and other parameters to ensure consistency and quality.
Technology
- AI classification
- Generative AISource: Generative AI: AI that generates new or synthetic content (e.g., images, videos, audio, text, code).
- System name(s)
- AI-Work
- Custom-developed code
- No
- Public source code
- Not reported
Sourcing
- How it was built
- Developed in-houseSource: b) Developed in-house
- Vendor (as reported)
- Azure OpenAI
- Vendors (standardized)
- MicrosoftOpenAI
A vendor is the supplier named by the agency. It does not identify the underlying model or AI technology.
Data and privacy
- Involves PII
- No
- Privacy Impact Assessment
- Not reported
- Authorization to Operate
- Yes
- Demographic features
- k) None of the above
- Training and evaluation data
- public data from EPA's Assessment Cleanup and Redevelopment Exchange System (ACRES)
- Federal Data Catalog
- catalog.data.gov ↗
Governance
0 of 8 minimum-practice questions answered. A blank answer means the agency reported nothing; it does not mean the practice is absent.
Potential impacts and how they were identified
Not reported