Federal AI Intelligence
Menu
Snapshot · OMB 2025 inventory · processed Oct 11, 2026
EPA · 78 · record R2053

RCRA PA

Environmental Protection Agency · OECA

Overview

Development stage
DeployedSource: c) Deployed – The use case is being actively authorized or utilized to support the functions or mission of an agency.
High-impact designation
High-impactSource: a) High-impact
Impact justification
Not reported
Start date
2022-10-01 (day precision)Source: 10/01/2022 00:00:00
Withheld from public reporting
NoSource: a) No

Mission

Topic area
Law Enforcement
Operational functions
Risk scoring and triage Derived by keyword rules; see methodology

Problem the AI is intended to solve

Risk scoring of Large Quantity Generators (LQGs) to support RCRA inspections

Expected benefits

Reducing staff time and better identification of potential violators

System outputs

Risk scoring (integers 0 to 4, inclusive) for LQGs

Technology

AI classification
Classical / predictive MLSource: Classical/Predictive Machine Learning: Models trained on data to make predictions or classifications based on identified patterns or relatio…
System name(s)
Environmental Compliance and History Online
Custom-developed code
Yes
Public source code
Not reported

Sourcing

How it was built
Contract and in-houseSource: c) Developed with both contracting and in-house resources
Vendor (as reported)
University of Chicago Energy and Environment Lab
Vendors (standardized)
None on the standard list

A vendor is the supplier named by the agency. It does not identify the underlying model or AI technology.

Data and privacy

Involves PII
No
Privacy Impact Assessment
Not reported
Authorization to Operate
Yes
Demographic features
k) None of the above
Training and evaluation data
The model was trained on historical compliance data.
Federal Data Catalog
Not reported

Governance

8 of 8 minimum-practice questions answered. A blank answer means the agency reported nothing; it does not mean the practice is absent.

Pre-deployment testingReported in placeSource: a) Yes
AI impact assessmentReported in progressSource: b) In-progress
Independent reviewReported in progressSource: d) In-progress
Ongoing monitoringReported in placeSource: a) Yes, sufficient monitoring protocols have been established
Operator trainingReported in placeSource: a) Yes, sufficient and periodic training has been established
Fail-safeNot applicableSource: b) Not applicable
Appeal processNot applicableSource: b) Not applicable
User and public consultationReported in progressSource: e) In-progress

Potential impacts and how they were identified

Not reported