AI-Assisted View Alert Management
Department of Veterans Affairs · VHA: Veterans Health Administration
Overview
- Development stage
- In development or acquisitionSource: a) Pre-deployment – The use case is in a development or acquisition status.
- High-impact designation
- High-impactSource: a) High-impact
- Impact justification
- Not reported
- Start date
- Not reported
- Withheld from public reporting
- Not reported
Mission
- Topic area
- Health and Medical
- Operational functions
- Clinical and medical Derived by keyword rules; see methodology
Problem the AI is intended to solve
By analyzing and prioritizing alerts, this tool will reduce unnecessary notifications and help clinicians focus on what matters most, enhancing care for Veterans.
Expected benefits
- Reduce alert fatigue and clinician burnout by minimizing unnecessary distractions. - Improve clinical efficiency and workflows through targeted triage and routing of critical alerts. - Enhance patient safety and resource allocation by prioritizing meaningful and actionable view alerts. - Increase return on existing technology investments by optimizing the performance of the current alerting functionality.
System outputs
Switchboard will build new AI models trained on annotated message data. Message annotation will be conducted in a structured process using a dataset of View Alerts (subject to design). The end-state AI models will apply the following label types to messages: - Label assignment of 5 core labels: Clinically Urgent, Clinician, Scheduling, Form, and Refill - Additional label assignment of VA-specific labels based on review of the dataset where patterns are identified. These will include: a) No potential provider action b) Medication nearing expiration c) Non-critical alerts for inactive providers Or additional view alert labels that are relevant to the VA workflow: - Flagging of clinically irrelevant View Alerts - Flagging of duplicative View Alerts
Technology
- AI classification
- Agentic AISource: Agentic AI: AI systems that perform tasks or make decisions autonomously with minimal human intervention.
- System name(s)
- Not reported
- Custom-developed code
- Not reported
- Public source code
- Not reported
Sourcing
- How it was built
- Not reported
- Vendor (as reported)
- Not reported
- Vendors (standardized)
- None on the standard list
A vendor is the supplier named by the agency. It does not identify the underlying model or AI technology.
Data and privacy
- Involves PII
- Not reported
- Privacy Impact Assessment
- Not reported
- Authorization to Operate
- Not reported
- Demographic features
- Not reported
- Training and evaluation data
- Not reported
- Federal Data Catalog
- Not reported
Governance
0 of 8 minimum-practice questions answered. A blank answer means the agency reported nothing; it does not mean the practice is absent.
Potential impacts and how they were identified
Not reported