Federal AI Intelligence
Menu
Snapshot · OMB 2025 inventory · processed Oct 11, 2026
VA · VA-25-2831 · record R2208

CITC Automated Fax Relabeling

Department of Veterans Affairs · VHA: Veterans Health Administration

Overview

Development stage
PilotSource: b) Pilot – The use case has been deployed in a limited test or pilot capacity.
High-impact designation
High-impactSource: a) High-impact
Impact justification
Not reported
Start date
Not reported
Withheld from public reporting
Not reported

Mission

Topic area
Health and Medical
Operational functions
Document processing and extraction, Clinical and medical Derived by keyword rules; see methodology

Problem the AI is intended to solve

Speed intake of outside medical records. Currently the VA system as a whole gets millions of pages of faxes a day. The subset of these related to care in the community (CITC) contain results of care that the VA itself has paid for in non-VA facilities. As CITC use increases, the burden of processing these faxes (uploading them and making them useful for VA physicians) is increasing. Delays in upload time lead to missing information about non-VA care.

Expected benefits

Enhancing patient outcomes (results of care that we are paying for is made more quickly available within the VA); increased efficiency (reduce or eliminate tedious nursing work of manually renaming faxes).

System outputs

Renamed faxes (with patient identifiers and document classification). The software is run by care in the community (CITC) staff (on their local GFE). These staff 'point' the fax processer program to the folder that contains inbound faxes. The software creates a subdirectory folder inside of the inbound fax folder and the output faxes (relabeled) are put into the output subdirectory.

Technology

AI classification
Natural language processingSource: Natural Language Processing: AI that processes, interprets, and shares information in human language.
System name(s)
Not reported
Custom-developed code
Yes
Public source code
Not reported

Sourcing

How it was built
Developed in-houseSource: b) Developed in-house
Vendor (as reported)
Not reported
Vendors (standardized)
None on the standard list

A vendor is the supplier named by the agency. It does not identify the underlying model or AI technology.

Data and privacy

Involves PII
Not reported
Privacy Impact Assessment
Not reported
Authorization to Operate
Not reported
Demographic features
Not reported
Training and evaluation data
Not reported
Federal Data Catalog
Not reported

Governance

0 of 8 minimum-practice questions answered. A blank answer means the agency reported nothing; it does not mean the practice is absent.

Pre-deployment testingNo answer reported
AI impact assessmentNo answer reported
Independent reviewNo answer reported
Ongoing monitoringNo answer reported
Operator trainingNo answer reported
Fail-safeNo answer reported
Appeal processNo answer reported
User and public consultationNo answer reported

Potential impacts and how they were identified

Not reported