Machine Learning for Avalanche Frequency Modeling
Department of the Interior · USGS
Overview
- Development stage
- DeployedSource: c) Deployed – The use case is being actively authorized or utilized to support the functions or mission of an agency.
- High-impact designation
- Not high-impactSource: c) Not high-impact
- Impact justification
- Not reported
- Start date
- 2024-01-24 (day precision)Source: 1/24/2024
- Withheld from public reporting
- NoSource: a) No
Mission
- Topic area
- Science
- Operational functions
- No function tag matched Derived by keyword rules; see methodology
Problem the AI is intended to solve
The machine learning (Random Forest) was used to identify vegetation characteristics in avalanche paths. This helps determine avalanche return periods in specific avalanche paths.
Expected benefits
Benefits include results that inform avalanche forecasters, transportation departments, and infrastructure planners on estimating spatial extents of avalanche return periods.
System outputs
The Random Forest model outputs vegetation classification that is necessary for identifying avalanche return periods.
Technology
- AI classification
- Classical / predictive MLSource: Classical/Predictive Machine Learning: Models trained on data to make predictions or classifications based on identified patterns or relatio…
- System name(s)
- Not reported
- Custom-developed code
- No
- Public source code
- Not reported
Sourcing
- How it was built
- Developed in-houseSource: b) Developed in-house
- Vendor (as reported)
- Not reported
- Vendors (standardized)
- None on the standard list
A vendor is the supplier named by the agency. It does not identify the underlying model or AI technology.
Data and privacy
- Involves PII
- No
- Privacy Impact Assessment
- Not reported
- Authorization to Operate
- No
- Demographic features
- k) None of the above
- Training and evaluation data
- We used high point density lidar data. Data collection and processing adhered to a maximum nominal post spacing of 0.35 m, with a mean point density of 16 points/m2. We also used four-band (red, green, blue, and near-infrared) NAIP imagery at 0.6-m horizontal spatial resolution.
- Federal Data Catalog
- Not reported
Governance
0 of 8 minimum-practice questions answered. A blank answer means the agency reported nothing; it does not mean the practice is absent.
Potential impacts and how they were identified
Not reported