DOI · DOI-0113 · record R2647
Lake-wide monitoring and assessment of Great Lakes fisheries with autonomous vehicles and image analysis
Department of the Interior · USGS
Overview
- Development stage
- PilotSource: b) Pilot – The use case has been deployed in a limited test or pilot capacity.
- High-impact designation
- Not high-impactSource: c) Not high-impact
- Impact justification
- Not reported
- Start date
- 2020-10-01 (day precision)Source: 10/1/2020
- Withheld from public reporting
- NoSource: a) No
Mission
- Topic area
- Science
- Operational functions
- Image and video analysis Derived by keyword rules; see methodology
Problem the AI is intended to solve
Fisheries monitoring and assessment
Expected benefits
Improved management of economically valuable predator stocks that underpin recreational, economic, and subsistence fisheries of the Great Lakes
System outputs
Whole-lake and site level estimates of species abundance for the Great Lakes
Technology
- AI classification
- Computer visionSource: Computer Vision: AI that processes and interprets visual data (e.g., images and videos).
- System name(s)
- Not reported
- Custom-developed code
- No
- Public source code
- code.usgs.gov ↗
Sourcing
- How it was built
- Developed in-houseSource: b) Developed in-house
- Vendor (as reported)
- Not reported
- Vendors (standardized)
- None on the standard list
A vendor is the supplier named by the agency. It does not identify the underlying model or AI technology.
Data and privacy
- Involves PII
- No
- Privacy Impact Assessment
- Not reported
- Authorization to Operate
- No
- Demographic features
- k) None of the above
- Training and evaluation data
- Underwater imagery annotated for locations of individual fish, geologic substrate, and invasive species
- Federal Data Catalog
- www.sciencebase.gov ↗
Governance
0 of 8 minimum-practice questions answered. A blank answer means the agency reported nothing; it does not mean the practice is absent.
Pre-deployment testingNo answer reported
AI impact assessmentNo answer reported
Independent reviewNo answer reported
Ongoing monitoringNo answer reported
Operator trainingNo answer reported
Fail-safeNo answer reported
Appeal processNo answer reported
User and public consultationNo answer reported
Potential impacts and how they were identified
Not reported