Federal AI Intelligence
Menu
Snapshot · OMB 2025 inventory · processed Oct 11, 2026
DOI · DOI-0019 · record R2726

Enabling FOIA Request Clustering Capability in the Document Review Platform (Density Based Algorithm alongside Term Frequency – Inverse Document Frequency (TF-IDF))

Department of the Interior · SOL

Overview

Development stage
DeployedSource: c) Deployed – The use case is being actively authorized or utilized to support the functions or mission of an agency.
High-impact designation
Not high-impactSource: c) Not high-impact
Impact justification
Not reported
Start date
2023-08-01 (day precision)Source: 8/1/2023
Withheld from public reporting
NoSource: a) No

Mission

Topic area
Other
Operational functions
Document processing and extraction, FOIA and records management Derived by keyword rules; see methodology

Problem the AI is intended to solve

Identifying Contextually Similar FOIA Requests. Developed in house is selected because while the document review platform is used it is not an out of the box functionality.

Expected benefits

This tool assists in identifying contextually similar FOIA requests but has some limitations such as editing stop words. While we still use this tool sometimes, we primarily use our in-house built tool.

System outputs

Grouped requests into clusters based on TF-IDF weighted vocabulary. Documents with distinctive overlapping terms form conceptual groups. This provides a visualization of requests that are conceptually similar. The clusters assist in identifying emerging topics of public interest, opportunities where proactive disclosure may fulfill multiple requests, and opportunities for collaboration on responses across multiple bureaus. While we primarily use our own in-house built tool for this capability, there are times when we still leverage this version.

Technology

AI classification
Natural language processingSource: Natural Language Processing: AI that processes, interprets, and shares information in human language.
System name(s)
Not reported
Custom-developed code
Yes
Public source code
Not reported

Sourcing

How it was built
Developed in-houseSource: b) Developed in-house
Vendor (as reported)
Not reported
Vendors (standardized)
None on the standard list

A vendor is the supplier named by the agency. It does not identify the underlying model or AI technology.

Data and privacy

Involves PII
No
Privacy Impact Assessment
Not reported
Authorization to Operate
No
Demographic features
k) None of the above
Training and evaluation data
FOIA requests
Federal Data Catalog
Not reported

Governance

0 of 8 minimum-practice questions answered. A blank answer means the agency reported nothing; it does not mean the practice is absent.

Pre-deployment testingNo answer reported
AI impact assessmentNo answer reported
Independent reviewNo answer reported
Ongoing monitoringNo answer reported
Operator trainingNo answer reported
Fail-safeNo answer reported
Appeal processNo answer reported
User and public consultationNo answer reported

Potential impacts and how they were identified

Not reported