Enabling FOIA Request Clustering Capability in the Document Review Platform (Density Based Algorithm alongside Term Frequency – Inverse Document Frequency (TF-IDF))
Department of the Interior · SOL
Overview
- Development stage
- DeployedSource: c) Deployed – The use case is being actively authorized or utilized to support the functions or mission of an agency.
- High-impact designation
- Not high-impactSource: c) Not high-impact
- Impact justification
- Not reported
- Start date
- 2023-08-01 (day precision)Source: 8/1/2023
- Withheld from public reporting
- NoSource: a) No
Mission
- Topic area
- Other
- Operational functions
- Document processing and extraction, FOIA and records management Derived by keyword rules; see methodology
Problem the AI is intended to solve
Identifying Contextually Similar FOIA Requests. Developed in house is selected because while the document review platform is used it is not an out of the box functionality.
Expected benefits
This tool assists in identifying contextually similar FOIA requests but has some limitations such as editing stop words. While we still use this tool sometimes, we primarily use our in-house built tool.
System outputs
Grouped requests into clusters based on TF-IDF weighted vocabulary. Documents with distinctive overlapping terms form conceptual groups. This provides a visualization of requests that are conceptually similar. The clusters assist in identifying emerging topics of public interest, opportunities where proactive disclosure may fulfill multiple requests, and opportunities for collaboration on responses across multiple bureaus. While we primarily use our own in-house built tool for this capability, there are times when we still leverage this version.
Technology
- AI classification
- Natural language processingSource: Natural Language Processing: AI that processes, interprets, and shares information in human language.
- System name(s)
- Not reported
- Custom-developed code
- Yes
- Public source code
- Not reported
Sourcing
- How it was built
- Developed in-houseSource: b) Developed in-house
- Vendor (as reported)
- Not reported
- Vendors (standardized)
- None on the standard list
A vendor is the supplier named by the agency. It does not identify the underlying model or AI technology.
Data and privacy
- Involves PII
- No
- Privacy Impact Assessment
- Not reported
- Authorization to Operate
- No
- Demographic features
- k) None of the above
- Training and evaluation data
- FOIA requests
- Federal Data Catalog
- Not reported
Governance
0 of 8 minimum-practice questions answered. A blank answer means the agency reported nothing; it does not mean the practice is absent.
Potential impacts and how they were identified
Not reported