Federal AI Intelligence
Menu
Snapshot · OMB 2025 inventory · processed Oct 11, 2026
TREAS · REQ-2025-02310 · record R2799

Establish localized Large Language Model (LLM)

Department of the Treasury · Bureau of the Fiscal Service (BFS)

Overview

Development stage
PilotSource: b) Pilot – The use case has been deployed in a limited test or pilot capacity.
High-impact designation
Not high-impactSource: c) Not high-impact
Impact justification
The tool, once deployed, is only for productivity and does not impact any of the defined high-impact areas
Start date
2025-09-10 (day precision)Source: 9/10/2025
Withheld from public reporting
NoSource: a) No

Mission

Topic area
Information Technology
Operational functions
Search and knowledge retrieval, Cyber threat detection, FOIA and records management Derived by keyword rules; see methodology

Problem the AI is intended to solve

AI Enablers (Enterprise solutions that enable AI to integrate into IT services infrastructures)

Expected benefits

Consolidation of multiple research initiatives into an aligned approach to research an enterprise LLM that will be trained on approved internal documentation to provide accurate, consistent, and rapid responses to employee inquiries. This will improve service delivery, reduce case escalations, and free personnel to focus on complex, mission-critical work

System outputs

AI-Powered Service Performance Metrics. Efficiency and Responsiveness: Track reductions in response times versus the pre-LLM baseline, first-contact resolution without escalation, and inquiry deflection handled entirely by the LLM. Accuracy and Consistency: Evaluate response accuracy through audits against official documentation, measure alignment with current Fiscal Service policies, and track reductions in incorrect or inconsistent responses compared to manual baselines. Security and Compliance: Ensure zero unauthorized access through effective role-based controls, conduct quarterly reviews for compliance with federal privacy, cybersecurity, and records management standards, and pass all required internal and external security audits. User Adoption and Satisfaction: Measure internal adoption rates, collect user satisfaction feedback through surveys or ratings, and assess training effectiveness using feedback and usage metrics. Operational Impact: Quantify staff hours reallocated from repetitive inquiries to higher-value work, track operational cost savings, and measure the breadth of internal systems and processes covered by the LLM’s knowledge base.

Technology

AI classification
Generative AISource: Generative AI: AI that generates new or synthetic content (e.g., images, videos, audio, text, code).
System name(s)
Not reported
Custom-developed code
Yes
Public source code
Not reported

Sourcing

How it was built
Developed in-houseSource: b) Developed in-house
Vendor (as reported)
Not reported
Vendors (standardized)
None on the standard list

A vendor is the supplier named by the agency. It does not identify the underlying model or AI technology.

Data and privacy

Involves PII
No
Privacy Impact Assessment
Not reported
Authorization to Operate
No
Demographic features
k) None of the above
Training and evaluation data
N/A. Evaluating tools only at this stage
Federal Data Catalog
Not reported

Governance

0 of 8 minimum-practice questions answered. A blank answer means the agency reported nothing; it does not mean the practice is absent.

Pre-deployment testingNo answer reported
AI impact assessmentNo answer reported
Independent reviewNo answer reported
Ongoing monitoringNo answer reported
Operator trainingNo answer reported
Fail-safeNo answer reported
Appeal processNo answer reported
User and public consultationNo answer reported

Potential impacts and how they were identified

Not reported