Federal AI Intelligence
Menu
Snapshot · OMB 2025 inventory · processed Oct 11, 2026
DOE · DOE-10 · record R3271

AI for Operations Center

Department of Energy · ANL - Argonne National Laboratory (SC43 OIM)

Overview

Development stage
DeployedSource: c) Deployed – The use case is being actively authorized or utilized to support the functions or mission of an agency.
High-impact designation
Not high-impactSource: c) Not high-impact
Impact justification
Impact of system failure or erroneous results is negligible.
Start date
2022-01-01 (day precision)Source: 2022-01-01T00:00:00
Withheld from public reporting
NoSource: a) No

Mission

Topic area
Other
Operational functions
No function tag matched Derived by keyword rules; see methodology

Problem the AI is intended to solve

Reduce human effort and increase efficiency in identifying Lessons Learned to work planning.

Expected benefits

Increase awareness and use of Lessons Learned.

System outputs

Recommended Lessons Learned documents related to proposed and ongoing Work Projects.

Technology

AI classification
Natural language processingSource: Natural Language Processing: AI that processes, interprets, and shares information in human language.
System name(s)
ANL-General Computing - Moderate Enclave
Custom-developed code
Yes
Public source code
Not reported

Sourcing

How it was built
Developed in-houseSource: b) Developed in-house
Vendor (as reported)
Not reported
Vendors (standardized)
None on the standard list

A vendor is the supplier named by the agency. It does not identify the underlying model or AI technology.

Data and privacy

Involves PII
No
Privacy Impact Assessment
Not reported
Authorization to Operate
Yes
Demographic features
Not reported
Training and evaluation data
ANL Operational data.
Federal Data Catalog
No.

Governance

5 of 8 minimum-practice questions answered. A blank answer means the agency reported nothing; it does not mean the practice is absent.

Pre-deployment testingReported in placeSource: a) Yes
AI impact assessmentNo answer reported
Independent reviewNo answer reported
Ongoing monitoringReported in placeSource: a) Yes, sufficient monitoring protocols have been established
Operator trainingReported in placeSource: a) Yes, sufficient and periodic training has been established
Fail-safeReported in placeSource: a) Yes
Appeal processNo answer reported
User and public consultationReported in placeSource: a) Direct usability testing

Potential impacts and how they were identified

Not reported