DOE · DOE-674 · record R3532
Scripting
Department of Energy · LM HQ - Office of Legacy Management (LM)
Overview
- Development stage
- DeployedSource: c) Deployed – The use case is being actively authorized or utilized to support the functions or mission of an agency.
- High-impact designation
- Not high-impactSource: c) Not high-impact
- Impact justification
- This AI use case does not serve as a principal basis for decisions or actions with legal, material, and binding
- Start date
- 2025-01-30 (day precision)Source: 2025-01-30T00:00:00
- Withheld from public reporting
- NoSource: a) No
Mission
- Topic area
- Energy and the Environment
- Operational functions
- No function tag matched Derived by keyword rules; see methodology
Problem the AI is intended to solve
AI-powered scripting will improve automation, speed, and efficiency.
Expected benefits
Reduced cost in alteration of ground water models improving ground water outcomes.
System outputs
Python code for use in models
Technology
- AI classification
- Natural language processingSource: Natural Language Processing: AI that processes, interprets, and shares information in human language.
- System name(s)
- LMGSS
- Custom-developed code
- Yes
- Public source code
- Not reported
Sourcing
- How it was built
- Purchased from vendorSource: a) Purchased from a vendor
- Vendor (as reported)
- Google Gemini
- Vendors (standardized)
A vendor is the supplier named by the agency. It does not identify the underlying model or AI technology.
Data and privacy
- Involves PII
- No
- Privacy Impact Assessment
- Not reported
- Authorization to Operate
- No
- Demographic features
- k) None of the above
- Training and evaluation data
- Data is held back from the models to validate model outputs.
- Federal Data Catalog
- Not reported
Governance
8 of 8 minimum-practice questions answered. A blank answer means the agency reported nothing; it does not mean the practice is absent.
Pre-deployment testingReported in progressSource: b) In-progress
AI impact assessmentReported in progressSource: b) In-progress
Independent reviewReported in progressSource: d) In-progress
Ongoing monitoringReported in progressSource: b) Development of monitoring protocols is in-progress
Operator trainingReported in progressSource: b) Establishment of sufficient and periodic training is in-progress
Fail-safeReported in placeSource: a) Yes
Appeal processNot applicableSource: b) Not applicable
User and public consultationReported in placeSource: a) Direct usability testing
Potential impacts and how they were identified
Improved management of the remedy