DOE · DOE-723 · record R3581
Crickets
Department of Energy · SRS - ESB - Savannah River Site - Enterprise System Boundary (SRFO)
Overview
- Development stage
- In development or acquisitionSource: a) Pre-deployment – The use case is in a development or acquisition status.
- High-impact designation
- Not high-impactSource: c) Not high-impact
- Impact justification
- End User Productivity Tool
- Start date
- 2024-10-01 (day precision)Source: 2024-10-01T00:00:00
- Withheld from public reporting
- NoSource: a) No
Mission
- Topic area
- Cybersecurity
- Operational functions
- No function tag matched Derived by keyword rules; see methodology
Problem the AI is intended to solve
Facilitate analysis and user intent on detect of access to potentially inappropriate web content
Expected benefits
Reduce analysis cycle and response times
System outputs
Prediction
Technology
- AI classification
- Classical / predictive MLSource: Classical/Predictive Machine Learning: Models trained on data to make predictions or classifications based on identified patterns or relatio…
- System name(s)
- Azure GOV
- Custom-developed code
- No
- Public source code
- Not reported
Sourcing
- How it was built
- Developed in-houseSource: b) Developed in-house
- Vendor (as reported)
- Not reported
- Vendors (standardized)
- None on the standard list
A vendor is the supplier named by the agency. It does not identify the underlying model or AI technology.
Data and privacy
- Involves PII
- No
- Privacy Impact Assessment
- Not reported
- Authorization to Operate
- Yes
- Demographic features
- k) None of the above
- Training and evaluation data
- Not reported
- Federal Data Catalog
- Not reported
Governance
5 of 8 minimum-practice questions answered. A blank answer means the agency reported nothing; it does not mean the practice is absent.
Pre-deployment testingReported in progressSource: b) In-progress
AI impact assessmentNo answer reported
Independent reviewNo answer reported
Ongoing monitoringNo answer reported
Operator trainingReported in placeSource: a) Yes, sufficient and periodic training has been established
Fail-safeNot applicableSource: b) Not applicable
Appeal processNot applicableSource: b) Not applicable
User and public consultationReported in placeSource: a) Direct usability testing
Potential impacts and how they were identified
No impacts