Agency dossier · NASA

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

425 reported use cases, 11.8% of all federal records. Rank reflects what was reported, not performance.

#2by records#9by deployed#12by high-impact#28by completenessof 41 agencies

Agency brief Compare View 425 use cases

Reported use cases42511.8% of all federal records Deployed266%Pilots215%High-impact10 answered any practice question

Disclosure completeness63%Mean of 12 core fields

Technology portfolio

Click a segment for records

Mission mix

Topic area as reported

Lifecycle

425 records

Within each stageHigh-impact · Gen./agentic

Pre-deployment0%13%

Pilot0%29%

Deployed4%15%

Retired0%40%

Lifecycle timeline

By agency-reported start year

Generative or agenticOther or unclassified39 of 425 records report a parseable start date

Position against all agencies

This agency vs the federal inventory

Deployed share6%vs 29%

High-impact share0%vs 12%

Generative or agentic14%vs 27%

Sourcing reported11%vs 44%

In-house development11%vs 28%

Disclosure completeness63%vs 67%

Cyan: NASA. Ring: all 3,611 records. Differences describe reporting, not quality.

Governance evidence

1 high-impact use cases · share reported in place

Pre-deployment testing0%

AI impact assessment0%

Independent review0%

Ongoing monitoring0%

Operator training0%

Fail-safe0%

Appeal process0%

User and public consultation0%

No answer reported

No answer is missing evidence, not evidence that a safeguard is absent. Click a segment to open those records.

Sourcing and vendors

Sourcing reported for 11%

No vendor on the standard list.

Related use cases

High-impact first, then deployed and most completeAll 425

Comparable portfolios

Most similar technology mix

DOI100%USDA96%EPA94%FHFA93%FDIC87%

Similarity is the cosine of each agency's AI-classification counts (unreported excluded); agencies with 10+ records. Click to compare side by side.

Operational functions

Keyword-derived tags

Field completeness vs. all agencies

Share of records with the field filled

Stage

100% vs 91%

High-impact designation

100% vs 88%

Topic area

100% vs 83%

AI classification

100% vs 82%

Problem

100% vs 84%

Benefits

100% vs 82%

Outputs

99% vs 79%

Sourcing

11% vs 44%

Start date

9% vs 39%

ATO

11% vs 43%

PII

11% vs 42%

Custom code

11% vs 47%

Bar: this agency. White tick: all agencies. A gap is a reporting gap, not a finding about the systems.

Bureaus and components

14 reported

GSFC: Goddard Space Flight Center22753%227 records · 53.4% of 425

MSFC: Marshall Space Flight Center4410%44 records · 10.4% of 425

JPL: Jet Propulsion Laboratory4310%43 records · 10.1% of 425

LaRC: Langley Research Center389%38 records · 8.9% of 425

ARC: Ames Research Center348%34 records · 8.0% of 425

JSC: Johnson Space Center133%13 records · 3.1% of 425

HQ: Headquarters92%9 records · 2.1% of 425

GRC: Glenn Research Center72%7 records · 1.6% of 425

OSMA: Office of the Chief Safety & Mission Assurance31%3 records · 0.7% of 425

SSC: Stennis Space Center20%2 records · 0.5% of 425

WS: White Sands Test Facility20%2 records · 0.5% of 425

AFRC: Armstrong Flight Research Center10%1 records · 0.2% of 425

GISS: Goddard Institute for Space Studies10%1 records · 0.2% of 425

OPS: Office of Protective Services10%1 records · 0.2% of 425