Agency dossier · OSC
Office of Special Counsel
1 reported use cases, 0.0% of all federal records. Rank reflects what was reported, not performance.
#40by records#32by deployed#15by high-impact#9by completenessof 41 agencies
Disclosure completeness92%Mean of 12 core fields
Technology portfolio
Click a segment for recordsMission mix
Topic area as reportedLifecycle
1 recordsWithin each stageHigh-impact · Gen./agentic
Pre-deployment0%100%
Lifecycle timeline
By agency-reported start yearGenerative or agenticOther or unclassified1 of 1 records report a parseable start date
Position against all agencies
This agency vs the federal inventoryDeployed share0%vs 29%
High-impact share0%vs 12%
Generative or agentic100%vs 27%
Sourcing reported100%vs 44%
In-house development0%vs 28%
Disclosure completeness92%vs 67%
Cyan: OSC. Ring: all 3,611 records. Differences describe reporting, not quality.
Governance evidence
0 high-impact use cases · share reported in placeThis agency designated no use cases as high-impact, so the minimum-practice questions did not apply.
No answer is missing evidence, not evidence that a safeguard is absent. Click a segment to open those records.
Sourcing and vendors
Sourcing reported for 100%Comparable portfolios
Most similar technology mixSimilarity is the cosine of each agency's AI-classification counts (unreported excluded); agencies with 10+ records. Click to compare side by side.
Operational functions
Keyword-derived tagsField completeness vs. all agencies
Share of records with the field filledStage
100% vs 91%
High-impact designation
0% vs 88%
Topic area
100% vs 83%
AI classification
100% vs 82%
Problem
100% vs 84%
Benefits
100% vs 82%
Outputs
100% vs 79%
Sourcing
100% vs 44%
Start date
100% vs 39%
ATO
100% vs 43%
PII
100% vs 42%
Custom code
100% vs 47%
Bar: this agency. White tick: all agencies. A gap is a reporting gap, not a finding about the systems.