Federal AI Intelligence
Menu
Snapshot · OMB 2025 inventory · processed Oct 11, 2026
Governance and accountability

Governance evidence

What agencies reported about the OMB M-25-21 minimum practices for high-impact AI. This is a disclosure analysis, not an audit, a compliance finding or an official assessment. An unanswered question is missing evidence, not evidence that a safeguard is absent.

Agency
Stage
High-impact
Topic
AI type1
Sourcing
Vendor
Function
Start year

Only records with a parseable start date match a year filter.

AI type: Computer visiontesting: blank

Practice-by-practice evidence

Denominator: 5 records · use cases that answered at least one practice question
Reported in placeReported in progressNot applicablePrecluded by law or guidanceNo answer reported
PracticeIn scopeIn placeIn progressNot in placeN/APrecluded or waivedOtherNo answerAnsweredIn place of applicable
Pre-deployment testing500000050%0% of 5
AI impact assessment5010000420%0% of 5
Independent review5400000180%80% of 5
Ongoing monitoring5400000180%80% of 5
Operator training5400000180%80% of 5
Fail-safe51004000100%100% of 1
Appeal process50400100100%0% of 4
User and public consultation5100000420%20% of 5

Answered = records with any answer ÷ records in scope. In place of applicable = reported in place ÷ (in scope minus not applicable, precluded and waived). Unanswered records stay in that denominator, so the rate is a lower bound on reported evidence, not an estimate of real practice.

Agency-by-safeguard heatmap

Cell: share reported in place, among applicable recordsIn placeAnswered
Agency by governance practice
TestingImpact assess.Indep. reviewMonitoringTrainingFail-safeAppealConsultationn
DOI––100%100%100%0%0%–4
SSA–0%–––100%0%100%1

Hatched cells: the agency answered nothing for that practice, so there is no evidence either way. Compare agencies with care: each agency is one reporting unit, and portfolios differ in size and type.

Records requiring further investigation

5 records with at least one practice unanswered or in progressOpen in explorer
Use caseStageTestAIAReviewMonitorTrainFail-safeAppealConsult
U.S. Wind Turbine Database
DOI · DOI-0080
DeployedNo answer reportedNo answer reportedReported in placeReported in placeReported in placeNot applicableReported in progressNo answer reported
Digital Identity Verification Services
SSA · R3122
DeployedNo answer reportedReported in progressNo answer reportedNo answer reportedNo answer reportedReported in placePrecluded by law or guidanceReported in place
Flor-AI: Developing a Remotely Sensed Image Classification Method for Inventory and Monitoring of Flora in Digital UAS Imagery
DOI · DOI-0079
PilotNo answer reportedNo answer reportedReported in placeReported in placeReported in placeNot applicableReported in progressNo answer reported
Automating the Detection and Classification of Wildlife in Aerial Imagery [2024 INV#WO0000000109409]
DOI · DOI-0075
PilotNo answer reportedNo answer reportedReported in placeReported in placeReported in placeNot applicableReported in progressNo answer reported
Automated photographic identification of Eastern box turtles
DOI · DOI-0073
PilotNo answer reportedNo answer reportedReported in placeReported in placeReported in placeNot applicableReported in progressNo answer reported

Unanswered analytical questions

Generated from the data; for follow-up with agencies
  1. VA designated 67 use cases high-impact but answered none of the minimum-practice questions for any of them. Were the practices assessed, and where is that recorded?
  2. DHS designated 4 use cases high-impact but answered none of the minimum-practice questions for any of them. Were the practices assessed, and where is that recorded?
  3. DOJ designated 3 use cases high-impact but answered none of the minimum-practice questions for any of them. Were the practices assessed, and where is that recorded?
  4. 1 high-impact use cases are reported as deployed while their AI impact assessment is reported in progress. Was deployment authorised before the assessment was complete?

These are questions the inventory raises but cannot answer. They are not findings of non-compliance.