Federal AI Intelligence
Menu
Snapshot · OMB 2025 inventory · processed Oct 11, 2026
Governance and accountability

Governance evidence

What agencies reported about the OMB M-25-21 minimum practices for high-impact AI. This is a disclosure analysis, not an audit, a compliance finding or an official assessment. An unanswered question is missing evidence, not evidence that a safeguard is absent.

Agency
Stage
High-impact
Topic
AI type1
Sourcing1
Vendor
Function
Start year

Only records with a parseable start date match a year filter.

AI type: Natural language processingSourcing: Developed in-house

Practice-by-practice evidence

Denominator: 5 records · use cases that answered at least one practice question
Reported in placeReported in progressNot applicableWaived by CAIONo answer reported
PracticeIn scopeIn placeIn progressNot in placeN/APrecluded or waivedOtherNo answerAnsweredIn place of applicable
Pre-deployment testing5220000180%40% of 5
AI impact assessment5120000260%20% of 5
Independent review5120010180%25% of 4
Ongoing monitoring53200000100%60% of 5
Operator training53200000100%60% of 5
Fail-safe51103000100%50% of 2
Appeal process5020200180%0% of 3
User and public consultation5210000260%40% of 5

Answered = records with any answer ÷ records in scope. In place of applicable = reported in place ÷ (in scope minus not applicable, precluded and waived). Unanswered records stay in that denominator, so the rate is a lower bound on reported evidence, not an estimate of real practice.

Agency-by-safeguard heatmap

Cell: share reported in place, among applicable recordsIn placeAnswered
Agency by governance practice
TestingImpact assess.Indep. reviewMonitoringTrainingFail-safeAppealConsultationn
DOE67%33%0%67%67%100%0%67%3
DOJ0%0%0%0%0%0%0%0%1
DOI––100%100%100%0%0%–1

Hatched cells: the agency answered nothing for that practice, so there is no evidence either way. Compare agencies with care: each agency is one reporting unit, and portfolios differ in size and type.

Records requiring further investigation

4 records with at least one practice unanswered or in progressOpen in explorer
Use caseStageTestAIAReviewMonitorTrainFail-safeAppealConsult
AI for Operations Center
DOE · DOE-10
DeployedReported in placeNo answer reportedNo answer reportedReported in placeReported in placeReported in placeNo answer reportedReported in place
Video Transcription Tool
DOJ · DOJ-0231
DeployedReported in progressReported in progressReported in progressReported in progressReported in progressReported in progressReported in progressReported in progress
AI workflow to process voicemail user service requests and translate them into actionable IT service tickets
DOE · DOE-729
Pre-deploymentReported in progressReported in progressReported in progressReported in progressReported in progressNot applicableNot applicableNo answer reported
LLM-Assisted Volcanic Alert Monitoring
DOI · DOI-0109
PilotNo answer reportedNo answer reportedReported in placeReported in placeReported in placeNot applicableReported in progressNo answer reported

Unanswered analytical questions

Generated from the data; for follow-up with agencies
  1. 1 high-impact use cases are reported as deployed while their AI impact assessment is reported in progress. Was deployment authorised before the assessment was complete?
  2. 1 high-impact use cases report using PII but give no link to a Privacy Impact Assessment. Is a PIA published elsewhere?
  3. 1 governance answers are ambiguous (for example, an answer option from a different question). What did the agency intend?

These are questions the inventory raises but cannot answer. They are not findings of non-compliance.