Federal AI Intelligence
Menu
Snapshot · OMB 2025 inventory · processed Oct 11, 2026
← All report templates
Federal AI Intelligence · U.S. Government AI Observatory

Governance disclosure assessment

Filtered: AI type = classical_ml; function = customer_service

Generated 2026-10-15 00:53 UTCDataset: 2025 Federal Agency AI Use Case Inventory (individually reported use cases), Office of Management and Budget (OMB). Version 2025-inventory@62d5baa65fa3, processed 2026-10-11, rules 2026.10.1. Static snapshot.Applied filters: AI type = classical_ml; function = customer_service · 6 records

Key findings

  • 6 use-case records from 3 agencies: 3 deployed (50%), 0 pilots, 3 in development or acquisition, 0 retired, 0 with no stage reported.
  • 1 records are designated high-impact; 0 of them (0%) answered at least one minimum-practice question.
  • 0% of reported deployed use cases (0 of 3) are classified as generative or agentic AI.
  • Of 1 deployed high-impact use cases, 0 report a completed AI impact assessment and 1 leave every minimum-practice field blank.
  • Interpretation: Blank practice fields are missing evidence, not evidence that a safeguard is absent. They mark where follow-up questions to the agency are most useful.
  • Sourcing is reported for 50% of use cases. Where reported, 100% involve in-house development.

Governance evidence: all use cases in the current filter

PracticeIn placeIn progressNot in placeN/A or precludedOtherNo answerIn scope
Pre-deployment testing0000066
AI impact assessment0000066
Independent review0000066
Ongoing monitoring0000066
Operator training0000066
Fail-safe0000066
Appeal process0000066
User and public consultation0000066

"In place" means the agency reported the practice as established. "No answer" means the field was blank; it says nothing about whether the practice exists.

Agencies with high-impact records

AgencyHigh-impactAnswered any practicePractice answers in place
VA100 of 8

Method

All figures are computed directly from the normalised inventory records. Category labels are normalised from the source answer options; original values are kept on each record. Governance answers are classified as in place, in progress, not in place, not applicable, precluded, waived, other or no answer, and blanks are never read as "no". See the Methodology page for full rules.

Limitations

  • Figures are what agencies reported in the 2025 inventory. They are not verified, and registration of use cases is not complete for every agency.
  • A blank answer is missing evidence, not evidence that a practice or safeguard is absent.
  • Counts are use-case records. A larger portfolio does not indicate better performance or greater AI maturity, and agencies differ in how they split systems into use cases.
  • The inventory has no budget, cost, accuracy or outcome data. None is shown or inferred here.
  • This is a disclosure analysis. It is not an audit, a compliance determination or an official government assessment.

Source records

All 6 records.

RecordAgency IDAgencyUse caseStage
R2226VA-24-2717VAVA.gov Chatbot: Summative ContentDeployed
R2325VA-25-5411VAVeteran Experience Office Retention/Trust Models in Customer Experience InsightsDeployed
R3108SSAPolicyNet Plain Language Search EngineDeployed
R1874DHS-2386DHSSentiment Analysis -FOD Field Offices Complaints and ReviewsPre-deployment
R2152VA-25-1184VAAsk VA Inquiry Automated Category Classification SystemPre-deployment
R2201VA-25-5799VAVA Health Connect (VAHC) Customer Relationship Management (CRM) - contact quality analysisPre-deployment

Prepared with Federal AI Intelligence by Irakli Petriashvili. Source: https://github.com/ombegov/2025-Federal-Agency-AI-Use-Case-Inventory