Resubmit Checker

Overview

Development stage

In development or acquisitionSource: a) Pre-deployment – The use case is in a development or acquisition status.

High-impact designation

Not reported

Impact justification

Not reported

Start date

2024 (year precision)

Withheld from public reporting

Not reported

Mission

Topic area

Not reported

Operational functions

No function tag matched Derived by keyword rules; see methodology

Problem the AI is intended to solve

The resubmit checker takes a list of proposal IDs and returns a list of similar proposals submitted to NSF in the past, scored by their similarity. This is useful for identifying resubmitted proposals for several purposes: evaluating whether to return without review for lack of revision, ensuring continuity of merit review, and the analysis of broader resubmission trends.

Expected benefits

Not reported

System outputs

Not reported

Technology

AI classification

Not reported

System name(s)

Not reported

Custom-developed code

Not reported

Public source code

Not reported

Sourcing

How it was built

Not reported

Vendor (as reported)

Not reported

Vendors (standardized)

None on the standard list

A vendor is the supplier named by the agency. It does not identify the underlying model or AI technology.

Data and privacy

Involves PII

Not reported

Privacy Impact Assessment

Not reported

Authorization to Operate

Not reported

Demographic features

Not reported

Training and evaluation data

Not reported

Federal Data Catalog

Not reported

Governance

0 of 8 minimum-practice questions answered. A blank answer means the agency reported nothing; it does not mean the practice is absent.

Potential impacts and how they were identified

Not reported